| rr 
 
    
 Berlin, Germany,
 29.12.2007, 20:37
   | Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) (Announce) | 
    
     | The Bochs Project released version 2.3.6 on 24 December 2007.
 Brief summary of changes:
 + More than 25% emulation speedup vs Bochs 2.3.5 release!
 + Up to 40% speedup vs Bochs 2.3.5 release with trace cache optimization!
 - Lots of bugfixes in CPU emulation
 - Bochs benchmarking support
 - Added emulation of Intel SSE4.2 instruction set
 
 Home page: http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
 Announcement: http://bochs.sourceforge.net/getcurrent.html
 Download: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=12580
 ---Forum admin
 | 
               
     | sol 
 31.12.2007, 03:16
 
 @ rr
 | Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) | 
    
     | I love it, it's definitely noticeably faster :) | 
                
     | RayeR 
 
  
 CZ,
 31.12.2007, 14:14
 
 @ sol
 | Bochs 2.3.6 available (Win32, Linux, sources) | 
    
     | > I love it, it's definitely noticeably faster :)
 I can see there's P4 and P4-SMP optimized version. Does it also utilize new virtualization instructions of C2D or is it in future plan?
 ---DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.
 | 
                
     | DOS386 
 02.01.2008, 01:38
 
 @ rr
 | BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | 
    
     | > The Bochs Project released version 2.3.6 on 24 December 2007.> More than 25% emulation speedup vs Bochs 2.3.5 release!
 > Up to 40% speedup vs Bochs 2.3.5 release with trace cache optimization!
 > Lots of bugfixes in CPU emulation
 
 Looks promising ... but doesn't really work
  
 [++] No compatibility break with HX - still loads and runs
 [+?] Can no longer reproduce the "EIP=0 bug" , while it still "works" on 2.3.0 - fixed (one of the "many fixes in CPU") ?
 [-?] My HD images are no longer recognized
  (they are still fine for BOCHS 2.3.0 and QEMU 0.9.0) [-?] Got 40% slowdown, not speedup compared to 2.3.0 (PKZIP 2.50 -exx on HDPMI32)
  ---This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
 the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
 | 
                
     | Japheth 
 
  
 Germany (South),
 04.01.2008, 12:23
 
 @ DOS386
 | BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | 
    
     | > [-?] My HD images are no longer recognized  (they are still fine for > BOCHS 2.3.0 and QEMU 0.9.0)
 
 That's an old hat, see http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=903
 ---MS-DOS forever!
 | 
                
     | DOS386 
 05.01.2008, 02:16
 
 @ Japheth
 | BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" | 
    
     | Japheth wrote:
 > That's an old hat, see
 
 Thanks for pointing
  ... but the old "hat" is still unfixed  
 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12580&atid=112580
 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=deta...;aid=1824189&group_id=12580&atid=112580
 
 What about the "speedup" ? I couldn't test anything except PKZIP because of the pretty limited space on a 1.4 MiB floppy
  ---This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
 the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
 | 
                
     | rr 
 
    
 Berlin, Germany,
 05.01.2008, 22:52
 
 @ DOS386
 | BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" | 
    
     | > Thanks for pointing  ... but the old "hat" is still unfixed  
 Maybe because nobody made a proper bug report.
 
 > What about the "speedup" ? I couldn't test anything except PKZIP because
 > of the pretty limited space on a 1.4 MiB floppy
  
 I tried to prove this speedup by running several old DOS benchmarks (streamd, speed600, ...) in Bochs 2.3/2.3.5/2.3.6, but I always get the same results. Maybe I (we?) misunderstood something?
 ---Forum admin
 | 
                
     | Rugxulo 
 
  
 Usono,
 06.01.2008, 04:59
 
 @ rr
 | BOX: not amused | 2.3.6 vs 2.3.0 | HD images | old "hat" | 
    
     | > I tried to prove this speedup by running several old DOS benchmarks> (streamd, speed600, ...) in Bochs 2.3/2.3.5/2.3.6, but I always get the
 > same results. Maybe I (we?) misunderstood something?
 
 Maybe you could try this?
  
 http://rugxulo.googlepages.com/paq8o8z-jan6.7z
 ---Know your limits.h
 |