DosWorld
03.12.2020, 13:05 |
Expanded BAT programming (Developers) |
No access to this page (link to here).
Could somebody open access to this page (or create standalone copy) ? --- Make DOS great again!
Carthago delenda est, Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse. |
rr
Berlin, Germany, 03.12.2020, 18:37
@ DosWorld
|
Expanded BAT programming |
> No access to
> this page (link to
> here).
No problems here. What's the error message you get?
> Could somebody open access to this page (or create standalone copy) ?
Grab your copy here. (Saved with Firefox.) --- Forum admin |
DosWorld
03.12.2020, 20:10 (edited by DosWorld, 03.12.2020, 20:27)
@ rr
|
Expanded BAT programming |
> No problems here. What's the error message you get?
Thank you! Error is something like "only invited users can read this (blog?)".
PS: By my opinion, main problem for this document - support old syntax and add new at one time. I don't try say (and don't think) like "old = bad, lets forget!", i am talk just about parsing troubles. Is it critical keep 101% syntax ? Also, what about requirement for memory consumption, etc ?
PPS: Personaly me, - i hate "goto" and thinks "if/else/while/break/continue is enough for 99% programming cases". :) (but with 99% of possibility - it could be wrong) --- Make DOS great again!
Carthago delenda est, Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse. |
jhall
06.12.2020, 22:42
@ DosWorld
|
Expanded BAT programming |
> > No problems here. What's the error message you get?
>
> Thank you! Error is something like "only invited users can read this
> (blog?)".
>
Oops, that was my mistake.
I had deactivated the old blog when I migrated the content to https://www.freedos.org/blog/
But it looks like I forgot to update the links from the website that pointed into the blog - like the obvious links from the How to contribute page.
I immediately re-activated the old blog so that's why you didn't have a problem accessing the blog later on.
FYI: The article DosWorld was looking for is on https://www.freedos.org/blog/?m=2018/08 |