david
13.09.2008, 18:19 |
UNRAR for DOS (Users) |
Hi, does anyone know working unrar unpacker for DOS ? I tried WinRAR for MS-DOS but it reports " out of memory " on EDR-DOS.
EDIT by rr: changed subject from "RAR_FOR_DOSes" |
rr

Berlin, Germany, 13.09.2008, 19:09
@ david
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> Hi, does anyone know working unrar unpacker for DOS ?
UNRAR version 3.71 beta 1 available
> I tried WinRAR for MS-DOS but it reports "out of memory" on EDR-DOS.
What the heck is "WinRAR for DOS"? WinRAR implies Windows, of course. --- Forum admin |
david
13.09.2008, 19:11
@ david
|
UNRAR for DOS |
I think that best solution is 7-zip to unpack RAR archive, but GPL unrar work for me as well, so pack into RAR archive is still commercial software?
EDIT by rr: quoting repaired |
david
13.09.2008, 19:18
@ rr
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> > I tried WinRAR for MS-DOS but it reports "out of memory" on EDR-DOS.
>
> What the heck is "WinRAR for DOS"? WinRAR implies Windows, of course.
What is WinRAR 3.80? of software, there is included rar32.exe which can be launch from DOS command line, but it write "out of memory" is it demonstration soft? or I have to buy license or what?
EDIT by rr: quoting repaired (again!) |
rr

Berlin, Germany, 13.09.2008, 19:26
@ david
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> ... so pack into RAR archive is still commercial software?
Yes. --- Forum admin |
rr

Berlin, Germany, 13.09.2008, 19:39
@ david
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> > > I tried WinRAR for MS-DOS but it reports "out of memory" on EDR-DOS.
> >
> > What the heck is "WinRAR for DOS"? WinRAR implies Windows, of course.
>
> What is WinRAR 3.80? of software, there is included rar32.exe which can be
That's wrong. Rar32.exe is part of "RAR 3.80 beta 4 for MS DOS", but not "WinRAR 3.80 beta 5".
> launch from DOS command line, but it write "out of memory" is it
How much RAM is in your PC? It might be a problem with the EMX DOS extender used by Rar32.exe. From Jemm's README.TXT:
EMX option to prevent EMX DOS extender from quickly terminating with
message "out of memory (RM)" on machines with large amounts
of RAM (> 256 MB). This is optionally because it makes Jemm
behave not fully VCPI compliant, but shouldn't hurt usually.
> demonstration soft? or I have to buy license or what?
All software for creating RAR archives is commercial sofware, also offered as trial version for evaluation. Why not just read the manufacturer's home page? --- Forum admin |
david
13.09.2008, 21:47
@ rr
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> How much RAM is in your PC? It might be a problem with the EMX DOS
> extender used by Rar32.exe. From Jemm's README.TXT:
>
> EMX option to prevent EMX DOS extender from quickly
> terminating with
> message "out of memory (RM)" on machines with large amounts
> of RAM (> 256 MB). This is optionally because it makes Jemm
> behave not fully VCPI compliant, but shouldn't hurt
> usually.
yes I use jemm, there is the problem, I should read manual for jemm, I have 768 Mbyte RAM instaled |
david
14.09.2008, 08:25
@ rr
|
UNRAR for DOS |
>From Jemm's README.TXT:
>
> EMX option to prevent EMX DOS extender from quickly
> terminating with
> message "out of memory (RM)" on machines with large amounts
> of RAM (> 256 MB). This is optionally because it makes Jemm
> behave not fully VCPI compliant, but shouldn't hurt
> usually.
Many thanks Option EMX with jemmex was successful, rar32.exe works |
DOS386
15.09.2008, 05:36
@ david
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> rar32.exe works
Except you have a very strong reason for preferring RAR I would recommend 7-ZIP instead.
RAR is always co$ty, UNRAR free (but no RAR reconstruction). --- This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft *** |
Rugxulo

Usono, 15.09.2008, 07:22
@ DOS386
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> > rar32.exe works
>
> Except you have a very strong reason for preferring RAR I would
> recommend 7-ZIP instead.
>
> RAR is always co$ty, UNRAR free (but no RAR reconstruction).
Agreed, but it would still be interesting to hear about unique features that RAR has (Stefan??).  |
DOS386
05.10.2008, 14:03
@ rr
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> UNRAR version 3.71 beta 1 available
Seems that 3.80 got released ... What's new: ???
> What the heck is "WinRAR for DOS"? WinRAR implies Windows, of course.
But I can't find a version history for Non-Win-UNRAR  --- This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft *** |
rr

Berlin, Germany, 05.10.2008, 15:03
@ DOS386
|
UNRAR for DOS |
> > UNRAR version 3.71 beta 1 available
>
> Seems that 3.80 got released ... What's new: ???
From rarx380.exe/rar/whatsnew.txt: 3. RAR displays the total progress bar when unpacking a multivolume archive if all volumes are present in the same folder.
> > What the heck is "WinRAR for DOS"? WinRAR implies Windows, of course.
>
> But I can't find a version history for Non-Win-UNRAR 
There's none, because UnRAR is derived from RAR source code automatically. --- Forum admin |
Rugxulo

Usono, 10.04.2010, 05:29
@ rr
|
UNRAR 3.93 for DOS |
UNRAR 3.93 was apparently made available as source on 15 March 2010. A quick list of changes is available, but I only see -r- (no recursion) and -ai (ignore attributes) as significant. (rr, feel free to compile for us ... else I can provide one, if needed. I did try, it builds okay with G++ 4.2.3, at least.) --- Know your limits.h |
Rugxulo

Usono, 10.04.2010, 05:35
@ Rugxulo
|
UNRAR 3.93 for DOS |
> UNRAR 3.93 was apparently made available as source on 15 March 2010.
Basically, it's hard to tell whats new with all the "WinRAR"-oriented crud. But a download of (EMX) RAR32 shareware has whatsnew.txt, so here's a brief list of changes since 3.80:
RAR - What's new in the latest version
Version 3.93
1. Bugs fixed:
a) in RAR 3.92 -xd:\path\dir switch could also exclude directories,
which path does not match the path specified in the switch
and only the directory name is the same as specified;
b) switches -y -or did not work correctly together. Switch -or was
ignored in presence of -y.
Version 3.92
1. In RAR 3.91 -x<mask> switch could also exclude directories
from archiving even if mask contained wilcard characters and did not
contain a path. For example, -x*. excluded all those directories,
which do not have the extension in the name. Now -x switch uses
RAR 3.80 approach for masks without path, excluding directories
only if mask does not contain wildcards and matches the directory
name exactly
2. If file matched two different masks in RarFiles.lst,
RAR could select the last match. Normally, if neither of masks
is a subset of another, the first match must be chosen.
Version 3.91
1. Bugs fixed:
a) hexadecimal search in "ih" command failed to find matches
if first byte in search string was greater than 127.
Version 3.90
1. New command line switch -r- disables recursion completely.
So 'rar a -r- arc dirname' command will add only the empty
dirname folder and ignore its contents. By default, if dirname
does not include wildcards, RAR adds its contents even if
-r switch is not specified.
2. If used when extracting, the new command line switch -ai
forces RAR to ignore file attributes. When using this switch,
extracted files will always have attributes assigned by
operating system to a newly created file by default.
3. If output file name is not specified in "cw" command,
RAR will send comment data to stdout.
4. When compressing stdin data with -si[name] switch, RAR sets
modification time of archived entry to current system time.
Previous RAR versions did not fill this field, resulting in
meaningless modification time for stdin.
--- Know your limits.h |
Laaca

Czech republic, 10.04.2010, 11:01
@ Rugxulo
|
UNRAR 3.93 for DOS |
I prefer to use command line RAR.EXE from WinRAR package. It works via HX-DOS and except bug with >256MB RAM works better the long file names support. In DOS/EMX version it doesn't work always properly with DOSLFN (sometimes truncates long file names) but in Win-console/HX it works without any problems. --- DOS-u-akbar! |
rr

Berlin, Germany, 10.04.2010, 21:09
@ Rugxulo
|
UNRAR 3.93 for DOS |
> UNRAR 3.93 was apparently made available as source on 15 March 2010. A
> quick list of changes is
> available, but I only see -r- (no recursion) and -ai (ignore attributes)
> as significant. (rr, feel free to compile for us ... else I can
> provide one, if needed. I did try, it builds okay with G++ 4.2.3, at
> least.)
Maybe. Maybe not. I feel uncomfortable with the build process I introduced once. And I'm no (Un)RAR user. --- Forum admin |
Rugxulo

Usono, 15.04.2010, 00:09
@ rr
|
UNRAR 3.93 for DOS |
> > UNRAR 3.93 was apparently made available as source on 15 March 2010.
> > (rr, feel free to compile for us ... else I can
> > provide one, if needed.)
>
> Maybe. Maybe not. I feel uncomfortable with the build process I introduced
> once. And I'm no (Un)RAR user.
NDN uses it, and he frequents here sometimes. 
http://rapidshare.com/files/375944931/unrar393.zip.html
MD5: 6B73A86275128F0DA305AC27BAB279E8 --- Know your limits.h |