Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

DUGL licensing. (Announce)

posted by FFK Homepage, 24.07.2008, 06:32

> > Asking authorization upfront before anything is a ackward

I thing "before" you have a kind a full functional shareware library, you can try and test capabilities, stability and performance and decide if it's useful or not for a possible commercial project.

> > Having to ask authorization and terms afterwards, after time investment is > > also not desirable.

True. First i think that a company or a person does need an authorization for each commercial product. Authorization mean that this company or person have the right to make a commercial software.
Second redistributing DUGL, making wrapper, ... is always free, and it's up to the final user to respect the license.
Maybe I'm not a good commercial but for me there two important points :
- I really want to promote DOS as i think and believe that it's a very good OS alternative.
- I do wish that DUGL can generate enough income that i will go full time developing it.

> > But anyways, you might want to take this as an hint to clarify the website
> > a bit, since I was originally reacting to the vagueness (as perceived by
> > me) of the site :_)

I'm open to any proposal, suggestion as for the moment there is no commercial interest. Not sure what would be the best choice for a good development of both DOS and DUGL.

> > If I understood the above correctly, the sound parts are usable without
> > authorization.

Yes.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 240 users online (0 registered, 240 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum