Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

nuclear war (Miscellaneous)

posted by kerravon, Ligao, Free World North, 25.11.2022, 19:38

> > I mentioned that SubC already generates
> > 8086 assembler
> > That's the backend, right?
>
> No. This is compiler frontend plus zero-level (or stub-level) backend.
> IMHO, this is wrong way, because generated code quality could not be
> greater then Turbo Pascal 6/7.0 or gcc -O0.

Ok, I don't know much about compilers.

And I'm not very good with complex algorithms.

I have skills - I don't know how to describe
them - but they aren't algorithms.

My dad convinced me to do engineering instead
of computer science, but in the 2nd year of
university I quit after they started teaching
differential equations and I decided this
wasn't for me.

I managed to get work as a tape jockey when I
was 18.

I looked at your link. Maybe if I spent enough
effort I could understand it, but for now I
want to avoid it.

What I know is that for literally 50 years, no-one
has been willing to release even a basic C90-compliant
compiler. Everyone who has the skills wants to lock
it down with a copyright. SubC is where it's at.
It's not far from being usable. Well, "not far" may
still be another 50 years, no-one knows for sure at
the moment.

BFN. Paul.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 82 users online (0 registered, 82 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum