Combined .com executable/DOS driver / RJDUMP (Announce)
> So it's not that dire, they just want you to presumably be able to actually
> unpack it to its original form (esp. for using newer UPX with better
> compression).
Thank you for your comments and others for their private messages re drivers. I have updated what will be RJDUMP v2.00 (with SYS driver support) so that it will display if a driver has been compressed with UPX, e.g:
RJDUMP v2.00a - (c)Copyright 1996-2010 Richard L. James
Filename 'xmgr.sys'
DOS File Size 0FA4h ( 4004d )
DOS SYS Header
Offset Address of Next Driver FFFFh ( 65535d )
Segment Address of Next Driver FFFFh ( 65535d )
DeviceName ???????? [UPX compressed]
Device attributes 1010000000000000b A000h ( 40960d )
Bit 15 = 1 Device driver type Character
Bit 14 = 0 Supports functions 03h and 0Ch? No
Bit 13 = 1 Supports function 10h? Yes
Bit 12 = 0 Reserved
Bit 11 = 0 Supports functions ODh and OEh? No
[verbose snip]
Bit 3 = 0 Current clock$ device? No
Bit 2 = 0 Current NUL driver? No
Bit 1 = 0 Current standard output driver? No
Bit 0 = 0 Current standard output driver? No
Offset address of strategy routine [UPX compressed] 000Ah ( 10d )
Offset address of Interrupt routine 0BEDh ( 3053d )
The above is however "work in progress", so be aware the released version may change how information is displayed (comments/requests for features welcome). I may NOT however include UPX EXE detection in this version (for the sake of time) even though the EXE decoding does recognize other EXE headers. e.g. TLINK.
In addition I have also included support in RJDUMP that will be helpful for those of us interested writing SYS drivers/experimenting with combined drivers, e.g. I have a personal long term interest in the possibilities of a combined driver and can see that functionality as useful, e.g. for ROMOS. I have also now added code to flag if reserved bits are set, e.g:
RJDUMP v2.00a - (c)Copyright 1996-2010 Richard L. James
Filename 'block1.sys'
DOS File Size 1070h ( 4208d )
DOS SYS Header
Offset Address of Next Driver FFFFh ( 65535d )
Segment Address of Next Driver FFFFh ( 65535d )
Device attributes 0010100011000000b 28C0h ( 10432d )
Bit 15 = 0 Device driver type Block
Bit 14 = 0 Supports functions 03h and 0Ch? No
Bit 13 = 1 Non-IBM format? Yes
Bit 12 = 0 Reserved
Bit 11 = 1 Supports functions 0Dh and 0Eh? Yes
[verbose snip]
Bit 7 = 1 Reserved [NON-ZERO!]
Bit 6 = 1 Supports functions 17h and 18h? Yes
[verbose snip]
Bit 1 = 0 Supports devices larger than 32Mb? No
Bit 0 = 0 Reserved
Offset address of strategy routine 0057h ( 87d )
Offset address of Interrupt routine 0066h ( 102d )
Note: I still plan/wish to reference some additional resources so that the information displayed is as complete as I can make it before a public release, in other words the reserved bits above are according to limited references that I have so far referenced as I have also been busy elsewhere.
Complete thread:
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Jack, 06.06.2010, 20:37
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Rugxulo, 07.06.2010, 04:20
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - Jack, 07.06.2010, 05:30
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - Rugxulo, 08.06.2010, 01:35
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - marcov, 08.06.2010, 23:18
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - Rugxulo, 09.06.2010, 04:23
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - marcov, 08.06.2010, 23:18
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - Rugxulo, 08.06.2010, 01:35
- Re: UIDE Unloading And Cache-Sizes. - Jack, 07.06.2010, 05:30
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Japheth, 07.06.2010, 07:51
- TSR vs DEVICE= - DOS386, 07.06.2010, 08:01
- TSR vs DEVICE= - RayeR, 08.06.2010, 15:46
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Arjay, 08.06.2010, 19:30
- TSR vs DEVICE= - RayeR, 09.06.2010, 02:00
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Japheth, 09.06.2010, 09:50
- TSR vs DEVICE= - RayeR, 09.06.2010, 16:15
- TSR vs DEVICE= - roytam, 09.06.2010, 18:18
- TSR vs DEVICE= - DOS386, 27.06.2010, 14:30
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Arjay, 08.06.2010, 19:30
- TSR vs DEVICE= - bretjohn, 18.06.2010, 21:50
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Jack, 18.06.2010, 23:29
- TSR vs DEVICE= - bretjohn, 19.06.2010, 01:18
- Nothing Against You! - Jack, 19.06.2010, 01:52
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Japheth, 19.06.2010, 09:02
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Arjay, 19.06.2010, 19:13
- TSR vs DEVICE= - bretjohn, 19.06.2010, 20:33
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Japheth, 20.06.2010, 09:04
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Arjay, 20.06.2010, 12:48
- TSR vs DEVICE= - bretjohn, 20.06.2010, 16:32
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Ninho, 20.06.2010, 17:34
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Japheth, 20.06.2010, 09:04
- TSR vs DEVICE= - Jack, 18.06.2010, 23:29
- TSR vs DEVICE= - RayeR, 08.06.2010, 15:46
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - marcov, 08.06.2010, 22:41
- "Capital Letters". - Jack, 08.06.2010, 23:15
- "Capital Letters". - marcov, 08.06.2010, 23:19
- No "Rants", But ... - Jack, 09.06.2010, 00:24
- "Capital Letters". - Arjay, 09.06.2010, 00:37
- "Capital Letters". - Jack, 09.06.2010, 00:48
- Seeking the middle ground: thinking re flexibility+realibity - Arjay, 09.06.2010, 02:29
- Bret's USB driver bugs - I was testing v0.11 by accident - Arjay, 09.06.2010, 02:50
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Jack, 09.06.2010, 04:29
- giving back a block of HMA - Ninho, 10.06.2010, 16:03
- Giving Back HMA ... - Jack, 10.06.2010, 17:03
- Giving Back HMA ... - Ninho, 11.06.2010, 09:48
- Giving Back HMA ... - Jack, 11.06.2010, 16:43
- Giving Back HMA ... - Ninho, 12.06.2010, 20:30
- Giving Back HMA ... - Jack, 11.06.2010, 16:43
- Giving Back HMA ... - Ninho, 11.06.2010, 09:48
- Giving Back HMA ... - Jack, 10.06.2010, 17:03
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Arjay, 11.06.2010, 19:29
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Jack, 11.06.2010, 21:42
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 01:12
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Ninho, 12.06.2010, 14:37
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 15:13
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Ninho, 12.06.2010, 15:49
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 16:33
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - RayeR, 13.06.2010, 10:41
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 13.06.2010, 16:11
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Ninho, 13.06.2010, 13:24
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 13.06.2010, 18:54
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - RayeR, 13.06.2010, 10:41
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 16:33
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 13.06.2010, 20:42
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Rugxulo, 14.06.2010, 04:27
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver / RJDUMP - Arjay, 19.06.2010, 15:08
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Matjaz, 20.06.2010, 11:58
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Turbo pascal example - Arjay, 20.06.2010, 13:06
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Turbo pascal example - Arjay, 20.06.2010, 13:39
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Turbo pascal example - Arjay, 20.06.2010, 13:06
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Rugxulo, 14.06.2010, 04:27
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Ninho, 12.06.2010, 15:49
- Combined SYS device drivers - more than 1 driver in a file - Arjay, 21.06.2010, 17:48
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver, multi-header drivers - ecm, 10.08.2010, 18:49
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver, multi-header drivers - Arjay, 10.08.2010, 19:41
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver, multi-header drivers - ecm, 10.08.2010, 20:21
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver, multi-header drivers - Arjay, 10.08.2010, 19:41
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 15:13
- Combined .com executable/DOS driver - Ninho, 12.06.2010, 14:37
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Arjay, 12.06.2010, 01:12
- Seeking the middle ground ... - Jack, 11.06.2010, 21:42
- giving back a block of HMA - Ninho, 10.06.2010, 16:03
- Seeking the middle ground: thinking re flexibility+realibity - Arjay, 09.06.2010, 02:29
- "Capital Letters". - Jack, 09.06.2010, 00:48
- "Capital Letters". - marcov, 08.06.2010, 23:19
- "Capital Letters". - Jack, 08.06.2010, 23:15
- No "Removable" HARD Disks Supported By UIDE! - Jack, 08.06.2010, 23:57
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - bretjohn, 15.06.2010, 22:47
- Further Comments ... - Jack, 16.06.2010, 01:35
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Rugxulo, 17.06.2010, 12:07
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - bretjohn, 17.06.2010, 16:53
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Rugxulo, 17.06.2010, 17:45
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - bretjohn, 17.06.2010, 16:53
- "That Will Be ALL!" For UIDE and USB! - Rugxulo, 07.06.2010, 04:20
Mix view