DOS ain't dead - mTCP new release 27/June/2010

mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom (Announce)

posted by mbbrutman , Washington, USA, 01.07.2010, 16:06

> It is great you are continuing to develop your utilities.
>
> If you plan to extend the network set it would be great to create some
> interactive FTP client. It means no writting commands like PUT or GET but
> something like Norton commander (just fileselector) to easily manage the
> files. We have no such native DOS aplication, only FAR manager via HX
> extender.

If you have looked at my apps you may have noticed that my user interfaces are spartan. Almost to the point of stripped clean. :-) The command line FTP client works fairly well - it transfer hundreds of files per mget/mput, and it can reliably transfer gigabytes per file.

I'd be happy to work with anybody who wants to tackle the user interface. It's not my strongpoint, and I have a bit of work ahead of me just keeping the code functional and performing well. (My next big task is to add support for IP fragments.)

Mike

---
mTCP - TCP/IP apps for vintage DOS machines!
http://www.brutman.com/mTCP

Post reply

Complete thread:

mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 21.01.2010, 18:06
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - Japheth, 22.01.2010, 09:47
  - mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 22.01.2010, 16:56
    - mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 07.02.2010, 16:35
  - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 03:22
    - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - Rugxulo, 14.03.2010, 03:56
      - Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 15:01
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 27.06.2010, 22:27
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Rugxulo, 28.06.2010, 06:30
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 28.06.2010, 12:05
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 28.06.2010, 14:22
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 07:08
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 13:14
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:06
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 01.07.2010, 13:20
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:03
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 19:16
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 03.07.2010, 16:04
        mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 14.07.2010, 03:51
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 12:41
  - mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 16:09
    - mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:49
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 14:07
  - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 15:22
    - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:30
      - mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 19:32
        mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 21:56
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 23.07.2010, 07:27
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 01:04
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 12:12
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 15:31
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 15:36
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 16:23
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 16:57
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 01:35
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Rugxulo, 25.07.2010, 05:34
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 25.07.2010, 06:16
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 17:17
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 26.07.2010, 02:03
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 26.07.2010, 03:11
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 02:53
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 27.07.2010, 03:31
        FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 03:40