FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues (Announce)
> Ethernet card. I don't remember the particulars of your machine, but I
> know it is far faster and it should be doing better.
MPXPLAY can play local compressed files with less than 5% CPU hogging and HD write performance is 15 MiB/s raw and 5 MiB/s files (FYI: FAT sucks), so the performance of the PC is not the problem at all (except you use Wista) 
> think that your experience is atypical and that you either have packet
> driver or hardware problems because you are getting far lower performance
> than you should, and mTCP is reporting the dropped packets for you
Looks like a problem of mTCP or packer driver or both together 
I had problems with other stuff too (WSTEST, MPXPLAY, OWB, WGET), so Arachne is the one providing best performance and causing least problems.
New ^^^ version 2010-Jul-1018, retest, performance just marginally better, also upload tested.
> mTCP applications should work on any DOS PC with an Ethernet adapter,
> SLIP or PPP connection. My personal testing includes:
> Generic AMD 386-40 with an NE2000 Ethernet adapter
> IBM PC XT at 4.77Mhz with a 3Com 3C503 Ethernet adapter
> IBM PC XT at 4.77Mhz with a Xircom PE3-10BT parallel-port to Ethernet
> IBM PCjr at 4.77Mhz with a NEC V20 CPU, Xircom PE3-10BT parallel-port to Ethernet
So you have 3 different 8086-based PC's ??? 
> A note about the screen shot - it was taken on a Windows XP system running a
> special build of DOSBox

> that has networking support. This is the best way to
> get screen captures.

> Your results on real hardware will be similar.
NO, see above.
Why don't you make the shot on your XT rather than XP ???
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 21.01.2010, 18:06
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - Japheth, 22.01.2010, 09:47
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 22.01.2010, 16:56
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 07.02.2010, 16:35
- Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 03:22
- Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - Rugxulo, 14.03.2010, 03:56
- Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 15:01
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 27.06.2010, 22:27
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Rugxulo, 28.06.2010, 06:30
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 28.06.2010, 12:05
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 28.06.2010, 14:22
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 07:08
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 13:14
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:06
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 01.07.2010, 13:20
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:03
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 19:16
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 03.07.2010, 16:04
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 14.07.2010, 03:51
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 19:16
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 16:03
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Laaca, 01.07.2010, 13:14
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - mbbrutman, 01.07.2010, 07:08
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 28.06.2010, 14:22
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - DOS386, 28.06.2010, 12:05
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Rugxulo, 28.06.2010, 06:30
- mTCP new release 27/June/2010 - now ported to Open Watcom - Arjay, 27.06.2010, 22:27
- Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - mbbrutman, 14.03.2010, 15:01
- Forget the library .. time to open-source the code? - Rugxulo, 14.03.2010, 03:56
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - mbbrutman, 22.01.2010, 16:56
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 12:41
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 16:09
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:49
- mTCP interfacing with TINY remote control for DOS? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 16:09
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 14:07
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 15:22
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:30
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 19:32
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 21:56
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 23.07.2010, 07:27
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 01:04
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 12:12
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 15:31
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 15:36
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 16:23
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 16:57
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 01:35
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Rugxulo, 25.07.2010, 05:34
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 25.07.2010, 06:16
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 17:17
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 26.07.2010, 02:03
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 26.07.2010, 03:11
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 02:53
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 27.07.2010, 03:31
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 03:40
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 27.07.2010, 03:31
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 27.07.2010, 02:53
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - mbbrutman, 26.07.2010, 03:11
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" | NTLFN issues - DOS386, 26.07.2010, 02:03
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 17:17
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 25.07.2010, 06:16
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Rugxulo, 25.07.2010, 05:34
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 25.07.2010, 01:35
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 16:57
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - Japheth, 24.07.2010, 15:31
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - DOS386, 24.07.2010, 12:12
- FTP ASCII vs binary "image" - mbbrutman, 24.07.2010, 01:04
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 19:32
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - Arjay, 20.07.2010, 17:30
- mTCP DOS - NC documentation issue (design bug)? - mbbrutman, 20.07.2010, 15:22
- mTCP DOS TCP/IP apps for small machines - Japheth, 22.01.2010, 09:47
Mix view