Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

NASM versions 2.09.01, 2.09.02 available (Announce)

posted by ecm Homepage E-mail, Düsseldorf, Germany, 23.09.2010, 15:01

> Sounds better if you use Vorbearbeiter (Voruebersetzer?) or so instead of
> preprocessor IMHO

Yeah but no one says that when they mean a compiler's preprocessor. A lot of computer tech terms are just used verbatim in german, so even just adapting the spelling from "Preprocessor" to "Präprozessor" is something. (I don't really care though. Programmers should use english if they use english programming languages. I.e. almost always.)

I'd rather go with "Vorübersetzer" though, that conveys the meaning better. ("Bearbeiter" (processor, editor) might describe the preprocessor better, but "Vorbearbeiter" doesn't convey that it runs before a compiler - as opposed to another "Bearbeiter".) "Compiler" also translates either as "Kompilierer" or "Übersetzer", where the latter fits with "Vorübersetzer".

---
l

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22781 Postings in 2123 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum