DOS ain't dead

2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (Announce)

posted by DOS386, 23.10.2010, 08:54

> v2.04b is most likely the final and "stable" variant of v2.04
> The JWASMR v2.04b binary is more reliable than in previous versions

Nope:



Bugs:

1. JWASMR misscompiles the "magic" jump in DOS3.ASM so it securely hangs (see shot) oops maybe this one is fixed in 2.04c

2. There are some aligns inside the binary and they contain random garbage rather than ZERO's. Is it documented anywhere that the aligns are expected and how they are supposed to work ?

3. The stuff is messed up inside the executable, or, more likely, fine in the executable but messed up in the source. Is this effect, if not considered as bug, documented anywhere ?

4. It produces garbage if -mz is not specified (see shot). Is this effect, if not considered as bug, documented anywhere ?

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Complete thread:

• JWasm v2.03 - Japheth, 05.08.2010, 07:09
  • JWasm v2.04b - Rugxulo, 13.10.2010, 06:35
    • JWasm v2.04b - Japheth, 13.10.2010, 08:56
      • JWasm v2.04b - Rugxulo, 14.10.2010, 01:18
      • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's - DOS386, 23.10.2010, 08:54
        • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's - Japheth, 23.10.2010, 13:24
          • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - DOS386, 24.10.2010, 04:20
            • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - Japheth, 24.10.2010, 10:41
              • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - DOS386, 17.11.2010, 04:24
  • JWasm v2.04c - Japheth, 17.10.2010, 21:15
    • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Rugxulo, 29.10.2010, 23:08
      • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Japheth, 30.10.2010, 08:59
        • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Rugxulo, 19.11.2010, 16:56
          • JWasm v2.04c - Space Invaders - Japheth, 21.11.2010, 07:46
      • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - rr, 30.10.2010, 22:00