DOS ain't dead

2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) (Announce)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 24.10.2010, 10:41

> - there is no "use32" in the code ... oh well maybe this is also a feature

... or maybe ignorance?

> > - page still says 2.04b

That's indeed a bug. Thanks!

However, please do me a favor: test some other software! The signal-to-noise ratio of your JWasm bug reports is too low for my taste.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• JWasm v2.03 - Japheth, 05.08.2010, 07:09
  • JWasm v2.04b - Rugxulo, 13.10.2010, 06:35
    • JWasm v2.04b - Japheth, 13.10.2010, 08:56
      • JWasm v2.04b - Rugxulo, 14.10.2010, 01:18
      • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's - DOS386, 23.10.2010, 08:54
        • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's - Japheth, 23.10.2010, 13:24
          • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - DOS386, 24.10.2010, 04:20
            • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - Japheth, 24.10.2010, 10:41
              • 2.04b vs 2.04c | BUG's (3 more) - DOS386, 17.11.2010, 04:24
  • JWasm v2.04c - Japheth, 17.10.2010, 21:15
    • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Rugxulo, 29.10.2010, 23:08
      • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Japheth, 30.10.2010, 08:59
        • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - Rugxulo, 19.11.2010, 16:56
          • JWasm v2.04c - Space Invaders - Japheth, 21.11.2010, 07:46
      • JWasm v2.04c - EZEDIT 2.0 - rr, 30.10.2010, 22:00