DOS ain't dead - mTCP

mTCP - TSR? (Announce)

posted by ecm , Düsseldorf, Germany, 30.10.2010, 00:04

I was referring to the difference between a static library and a TSR implementation. The TSR implementation does not add any size limitations. (Though of course your code might become a little larger to use far calling and such.)

---
l

Post reply

Complete thread:

mTCP 2010-09-16 Version - mbbrutman, 17.09.2010, 02:16
- mTCP 2010-09-16 Version - 60-Bytes-BUG fixed - DOS386, 13.10.2010, 03:43
  - mTCP 2010-09-16 Version - 60-Bytes-BUG fixed - mbbrutman, 13.10.2010, 06:16
    - mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - mbbrutman, 21.10.2010, 05:59
      - mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - ecm, 21.10.2010, 06:06
      - mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - Rugxulo, 21.10.2010, 08:21
        mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - mbbrutman, 21.10.2010, 15:23
      - mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - ecm, 22.10.2010, 18:48
        mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - mbbrutman, 22.10.2010, 20:40
        mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - ecm, 22.10.2010, 21:59
        License choice? - mbbrutman, 23.10.2010, 23:36
        License choice? - Rugxulo, 24.10.2010, 00:55
        License choice? - mbbrutman, 24.10.2010, 16:19
        License choice? | TEST | not DOG-BOX - DOS386, 24.10.2010, 04:05
        Problem reports - send me a TRACE! - mbbrutman, 24.10.2010, 16:15
        License choice? - ecm, 28.10.2010, 23:02
        License choice? - mbbrutman, 29.10.2010, 01:33
        License choice? - ecm, 29.10.2010, 14:02
        mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - Rugxulo, 22.10.2010, 22:24
        License choice? - mbbrutman, 23.10.2010, 23:42
      - mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - Laaca, 29.10.2010, 07:51
        mTCP 2010-10-20 Version - IP Fragments! - mbbrutman, 29.10.2010, 17:32
        mTCP - TSR? - ecm, 29.10.2010, 23:31
        mTCP - TSR? - mbbrutman, 29.10.2010, 23:50
        mTCP - TSR? - ecm, 30.10.2010, 00:04