allocation no higher than the PSP (Developers)
> If I replace the int 21 function 48h by mine
I assumed you didn't want to do that.
> Seriously I'd like to hear of others' opinion on the polite controversy
I see no controversy. I too would welcome any input on TSR development though.
> I've been stunned by CM's assumptions of TSR's allowed to basically
> mess with DOS in whatever way they fancied.
Nah, as I mentioned my assumption was wrong. While in DOS (potentially in code messing with MCBs itself: 21.48 or 21.4A or 21.5803 or 21.4B or 21.67) TSRs must not alter MCBs. Exceptions to this might exist, for example, I think a TSR can probably free its own MCBs at any time without risk.
> All this is entertaining, how much I regret I can't get a little more time
> to try and finalise all the interesting ideas...
Don't we all?
---
l
Complete thread:
- keyb: new! memory scheme, easy TEST - Ninho, 22.05.2011, 19:10 ![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif) ![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif) - boring - ecm, 22.05.2011, 23:58- boring - Ninho, 23.05.2011, 01:20- not that boring after all (nt) - ecm, 23.05.2011, 13:27
 
 
- boring - Ninho, 23.05.2011, 01:20
- review - ecm, 23.05.2011, 13:18- review - Ninho, 23.05.2011, 23:10- review - ecm, 24.05.2011, 00:45- review - Ninho, 24.05.2011, 12:50- review - ecm, 24.05.2011, 15:20- of TSR powers & limits - Ninho, 25.05.2011, 11:24- Swap! - ecm, 25.05.2011, 14:13- of TSR powers & limits - Ninho, 25.05.2011, 15:14
 
 
- Swap! - ecm, 25.05.2011, 14:13
 
- of TSR powers & limits - Ninho, 25.05.2011, 11:24
 
- review - ecm, 24.05.2011, 15:20
 
- review - Ninho, 24.05.2011, 12:50
 
- review - ecm, 24.05.2011, 00:45
- fix - Ninho, 29.05.2011, 14:36- opinion - ecm, 29.05.2011, 14:49- opinion - Ninho, 29.05.2011, 16:36- evaluation - ecm, 29.05.2011, 17:26- evaluation - Ninho, 29.05.2011, 21:00- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 29.05.2011, 22:17- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 19:26- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 30.05.2011, 19:33- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 21:14- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 30.05.2011, 21:20- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 23:50- allocation no higher than the PSP - ecm, 30.05.2011, 23:56- allocation no higher than the PSP - Ninho, 01.06.2011, 18:56- allocation no higher than the PSP - ecm, 01.06.2011, 19:10
 
 
- allocation no higher than the PSP - Ninho, 01.06.2011, 18:56
 
- allocation no higher than the PSP - ecm, 30.05.2011, 23:56
 
- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 23:50
 
- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 30.05.2011, 21:20
 
- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 21:14
 
- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 30.05.2011, 19:33
 
- hardly a 100% solution - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 19:26
 
- hardly a 100% solution - ecm, 29.05.2011, 22:17
 
- evaluation - Ninho, 29.05.2011, 21:00
- opinion - Ninho, 30.05.2011, 19:04- sti - ecm, 30.05.2011, 19:26
 
 
- evaluation - ecm, 29.05.2011, 17:26
 
- opinion - Ninho, 29.05.2011, 16:36
 
- opinion - ecm, 29.05.2011, 14:49
 
- review - Ninho, 23.05.2011, 23:10
 
- boring - ecm, 22.05.2011, 23:58
 Board view
Board view Mix view
Mix view

