DOS ain't dead

LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC (Developers)

posted by RayeR , CZ, 09.09.2011, 19:38
(edited by RayeR on 10.09.2011, 12:31)

> 1.3 times or 0.3 times as fast as GCC ?

oh, of course i meant up to ~30 MORE than gcc otherwise I wouldn't mentioned it :)

> > Code generation supported for Pentium processors and up
>
> bad ...

Maybe still usable for some code. Btw it there some exe/asm analyzer that will find what instruction set is required to run this code?

EDIT: Some benchmarks here

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

Complete thread:

• LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 08.09.2011, 22:41
  • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 08.09.2011, 23:01
    • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:29
      • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:34
        • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 09.09.2011, 05:44
          • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 09.09.2011, 19:07
            • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 19:44
            • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 10.09.2011, 23:34
              • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 11.09.2011, 02:33
                • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:46
                • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 13.09.2011, 01:53
              • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:30
                • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 13.09.2011, 02:00
                  • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 14.09.2011, 01:25
  • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 09.09.2011, 18:41
    • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 19:38
      • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 11.09.2011, 08:13
        • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:16
          • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 13.09.2011, 07:34
            • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 13.09.2011, 19:50
              • LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 14.09.2011, 10:36