DOS ain't dead - indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem

indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem (Developers)

posted by RayeR , CZ, 13.05.2012, 20:49
(edited by RayeR on 13.05.2012, 21:00)

> What, worried about one byte?
> Reminds me of "ENTER ..,.." instruction (186+).

enter has 4 byte opcode...

> POP WORD [SS:BP+6] >
>
> Isn't SS: implicit when using [BP]? Make sure this isn't generating that
> extra byte you don't want as you probably don't need to say it explicitly.

Yes, you're right, thanks.
Register Default Segment Valid Overrides BP SS DS, ES, CS SI or DI DS ES, SS, CS DI strings ES None SI strings DS ES, SS, CS
BTW I can see that I had more [SS:BP+x] occurences in code so I saved much more :)

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

Post reply

Complete thread:

indirect far jmp in NASM - RayeR, 10.05.2012, 10:46
- indirect far jmp in NASM - RayeR, 10.05.2012, 13:16
  - indirect far jmp - ecm, 10.05.2012, 13:26
  - indirect far jmp in NASM - Rugxulo, 10.05.2012, 13:26
    - indirect far jmp in NASM - RayeR, 10.05.2012, 14:07
      - indirect far jmp - ecm, 10.05.2012, 15:17
        indirect far jmp - RayeR, 11.05.2012, 00:47
        indirect far jmp - ecm, 11.05.2012, 12:46
        indirect far jmp - bretjohn, 11.05.2012, 18:53
        indirect far jmp - RayeR, 11.05.2012, 19:31
        indirect far jmp - bretjohn, 11.05.2012, 22:31
        indirect far jmp - ecm, 11.05.2012, 22:33
        indirect far jmp - RayeR, 12.05.2012, 00:33
        indirect far jmp - Arjay, 12.05.2012, 01:07
        indirect far jmp - ecm, 12.05.2012, 01:27
        indirect far jmp - Arjay, 12.05.2012, 11:09
        indirect far jmp - ecm, 12.05.2012, 21:18
        indirect far jmp - RayeR, 12.05.2012, 21:17
        indirect far jmp/call - Chaining Interrupt Service Routines - Arjay, 13.05.2012, 13:16
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 13.05.2012, 04:01
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 13.05.2012, 04:27
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 13.05.2012, 15:33
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 13.05.2012, 17:05
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 13.05.2012, 17:15
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 13.05.2012, 19:19
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - Rugxulo, 13.05.2012, 20:02
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 13.05.2012, 20:49
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 13.05.2012, 23:49
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 13.05.2012, 23:40
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 14.05.2012, 00:07
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 14.05.2012, 01:19
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 13.05.2012, 23:44
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 14.05.2012, 18:30
        redundant override in "ss:bp" for clarity - ecm, 14.05.2012, 18:47
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 14.05.2012, 18:50
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 14.05.2012, 20:16
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 14.05.2012, 20:21
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 14.05.2012, 21:42
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 15.05.2012, 18:45
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - ecm, 15.05.2012, 18:53
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - bretjohn, 15.05.2012, 20:13
        indirect far jmp - calling old INT problem - RayeR, 17.05.2012, 01:25