x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 (Developers)
> It's too low in RAM and storage as well as having battery issues. Oh, and
> the screen is a weird size, and it's really underpowered. I mean, the
> world was a different place back then. It's not a big a deal now, but it's
> still (vaguely) cool. Something like the PoquetPC is probably more
> impressive (although I admit I never tried either). Who knows, maybe a
> Sharp Zaurus can run DOSEMU?    But whenever you hear people doing
   But whenever you hear people doing
> such, it's usually for games. (Doesn't the GP2X or whatever have a partial
> DOSBox port?)
I've bought two IPaqs for FPC PocketPC development (one with PocketPC 2003 (wince4 iirc), the other with wince 5 (windows mobile 5).
I tried to get fast expandable ones, hx2750's, I can test if possible.
Complete thread:
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 22.11.2008, 15:15 ![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif) ![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif) - x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 25.11.2008, 06:47- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - ecm, 25.11.2008, 13:31- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 25.11.2008, 22:11
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 25.11.2008, 21:21- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 25.11.2008, 21:59- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 25.11.2008, 22:10- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 28.11.2008, 07:17- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 05.12.2008, 08:55
 
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 28.11.2008, 07:17
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 25.11.2008, 22:10
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - RayeR, 25.11.2008, 22:22- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 26.11.2008, 20:57- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 28.11.2008, 00:09- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - marcov, 28.11.2008, 15:41
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 30.11.2008, 18:33- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 30.11.2008, 20:53- portable handhelds' battery life - Rugxulo, 30.11.2008, 21:06
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 30.11.2008, 22:38
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - RayeR, 30.11.2008, 22:41
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 30.11.2008, 20:53
 
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 28.11.2008, 00:09
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - rr, 26.11.2008, 20:57
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - mht, 25.11.2008, 21:59
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - ecm, 25.11.2008, 13:31
 
- x86 flags after bit shifts with count = 0 - Rugxulo, 25.11.2008, 06:47
 Board view
Board view Mix view
Mix view