DOS ain't dead - 65536 byte text files

65536 byte text files (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 07.04.2009, 00:01

> RXDOSDEV ASM 63.854 20.01.2009 20:40> RXDOSCFG ASM 64.057 11.01.2009 19:55 > RXDOSDV2 ASM 70.480 14.12.2008 21:30 > RXDOSINI ASM 83.478 01.04.2009 15:55 > RXDOSLFN ASM 119.038 11.01.2009 21:11 > RXDOS ASM 160.990 01.04.2009 18:54
>
> There you go. (The decimal point of the file sizes is none, it's the
> European thousands separator.) The RxDOSLFN file really contains the LFN
> handling only, while the main RxDOS file contains some tables and
> interrupt handlers plus the high layer of many subfunctions. These files,
> as opposed to the originals, already use tabs. If you're interested, the
> remaining kernel files (mostly below 30 KiB each) sum up to another
> 336,070 bytes.
>
> You could argue that writing stuff in C is better, then :-D

No way! What you save in source size is lost in .EXE size. Ideally, mix and match C + ASM for best results either way.

Post reply

Complete thread:

GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 01.04.2009, 20:46
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - marcov, 01.04.2009, 23:28
  - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 02.04.2009, 00:20
    - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 18:38
      - GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:10
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 04.04.2009, 22:23
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 05.04.2009, 23:47
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Dennis, 06.04.2009, 01:25
        65536 byte text files - ecm, 06.04.2009, 19:23
        65536 byte text files - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:01
        65536 byte text files - ecm, 07.04.2009, 00:14
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:27
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 07.04.2009, 13:20
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 13:35
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 10:33
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 08.04.2009, 19:24
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - RayeR, 08.04.2009, 21:09
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - rr, 08.04.2009, 21:16
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 01:11
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 09.04.2009, 23:15
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - Rugxulo, 10.04.2009, 05:02
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - EZGCC for v2 - RayeR, 10.04.2009, 14:05
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 08.04.2009, 21:44
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 00:55
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 09:09
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 14:14
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 09.04.2009, 21:17
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:38
        C vs. ASM (size vs speed) - marcov, 10.04.2009, 10:16
        EZ-GCC v2 for 386 (1.2 MB 5.25" FD) - Rugxulo, 16.04.2009, 18:38
        EZ-GCC v2 for 386, GNU Emacs 23.0.95 pretest - Rugxulo, 05.07.2009, 21:22
        GNU Emacs 23.0.96 pretest (last one!) - Rugxulo, 16.07.2009, 06:07
        GNU Emacs 23.1 - Rugxulo, 11.09.2009, 06:54
        GNU Emacs for DJGPP (22.3 or 23.0.92) - Rugxulo, 07.04.2009, 00:00
- GNU Emacs 23.0.92 pretest (DJGPP) - Rugxulo, 04.04.2009, 20:38
- GNU Emacs for DJGPP (23.0.92 "pretest") - Rugxulo, 09.04.2009, 21:40