Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" (Developers)
> Do you have a specific protocol in mind?  If this is something you're
> wanting, you probably need to come with a design/API/protocol and
under progress 
> do an initial implementation for BIOS/kernel provided drives.  Like I
> stated earlier, if I did it for USBDRIVE I would limit my scope to USB
> disks, and it sounds like you want much more than that.
Knowing whether 2 volumes are on same USB HD (use big buffer) or not would be useful.
> I'm guessing that you are referring to a drive using its internal buffers
> to do the copy instead of actually transferring the data across the bus
> into RAM and back across the bus again?  If that's the case, it would take
> much more intimate knowledge of how the disk works than the
> volume-to-physical relationships.  You would have to know specific hardware
> details, like whether the disk even has an internal buffer that you can
> manipulate or not (e.g., USB flash drives don't, but USB-attached hard
> drives might).
Interesting, but not what I was referring to.
When copying to the same HD, you preferably use a BIG BUFFER (say 16 MiB), while in other cases (HD0->HD1, HD0->RAMDISK,  HD0->USBstick0, USBstick2->USBstick2, ...) a small buffer (say 64 KiB) would be sufficient and maybe even faster.
Also storage media durability should be reported (true for HD, sticks, floppy, false for RAMDISK).
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- Protectmode handler called from realmode - Laaca, 12.08.2010, 21:12 ![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif) ![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif) - Protectmode handler called from realmode - ecm, 12.08.2010, 21:24- Protectmode handler called from realmode - Laaca, 13.08.2010, 01:46- Protectmode handler called from realmode - Japheth, 13.08.2010, 07:31- Protectmode handler called from realmode - bretjohn, 13.08.2010, 18:43- EDIT: Protectmode handler called from realmode - bretjohn, 13.08.2010, 19:25- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 26.08.2010, 09:33- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 26.08.2010, 19:03- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 27.08.2010, 03:25- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 27.08.2010, 16:47- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 28.08.2010, 01:26- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 28.08.2010, 16:35- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 06.09.2010, 20:10
 
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 28.08.2010, 16:35
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 28.08.2010, 01:26
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 27.08.2010, 16:47
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 27.08.2010, 03:25
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - bretjohn, 26.08.2010, 19:03
 
- Volumes vs physical storage media | WAS "Protectmod handl" - DOS386, 26.08.2010, 09:33
 
- EDIT: Protectmode handler called from realmode - bretjohn, 13.08.2010, 19:25
 
- Protectmode handler called from realmode - bretjohn, 13.08.2010, 18:43
 
- Protectmode handler called from realmode - Japheth, 13.08.2010, 07:31
 
- Protectmode handler called from realmode - Laaca, 13.08.2010, 01:46
 
- Protectmode handler called from realmode - ecm, 12.08.2010, 21:24
 Board view
Board view Mix view
Mix view