using links for dos better with speech? (Users)
Well, I will tell you what I did. still, given what you say here, it
might not be complete. How do you reach Mikula, as I truly need an
answer to my question, and the inclusion of things like a braille
terminal make little sense, unless I am missing items as well.
I searched for "links for dos," in this forum. One post indicated
the update, providing a link to an ftp site. on that site are two
files both dated in Aug that are executables, a full edition of
links, and a text edition without Javascript. I simply got both
files. Given the javascr*** edition seeks a .cfg file that is not
included, while still running due to my internet connection
incorporating dhtp, the file I got does not include all of the
libraries, a surprise as those installing the browser for the first
time need them. At the very least there should be a copy distributed
compiled with all one needs to run the browser at its best.
Kare
Complete thread:
- using links for dos better with speech? - Karen, 29.11.2019, 21:50
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 03.12.2019, 22:32
- using links for dos better with speech? - Karen, 06.12.2019, 01:02
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 08.12.2019, 10:39
- using links for dos better with speech? - RayeR, 11.12.2019, 04:55
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 13.12.2019, 13:49
- using links for dos better with speech? - Karen, 28.12.2019, 01:10
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 13.12.2019, 13:49
- using links for dos better with speech? - RayeR, 11.12.2019, 04:55
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 08.12.2019, 10:39
- using links for dos better with speech? - Karen, 06.12.2019, 01:02
- using links for dos better with speech? - david, 05.02.2020, 16:41
- using links for dos better with speech? - KormaX, 03.12.2019, 22:32