xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? (Users)
> > > So my question: Is it useful to implement version 1.5 into the future
> > > FDT24xx versions?
> >
> > Who uses xcopy?
>
> I just did it.
> FD uses this version 1.4 and the bug that was reported at:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/bugs/346/
>
> still exists till today.
>
> Seems there are some more.
>
> So a compiled version of 1.5 would be very helpful for testing!
I have this in my archive, don't remember where I got it:
https://transfert.free.fr/hhDOR3A
7 days link
Complete thread:
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - fritz.mueller, 16.02.2024, 15:47
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - tom, 16.02.2024, 18:57
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - rr, 16.02.2024, 19:29
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - rr, 16.02.2024, 19:30
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - kerravon, 16.02.2024, 21:44
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - fritz.mueller, 05.08.2024, 17:33
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - nico7550, 09.08.2024, 21:33
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - fritz.mueller, 12.08.2024, 21:35
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - fritz.mueller, 14.08.2024, 13:36
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - fritz.mueller, 12.08.2024, 21:35
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - nico7550, 09.08.2024, 21:33
- xcopy - is there a reason why v 1.5 was not published? - tom, 16.02.2024, 18:57