HimemX v3.32 bug ? (DOSX)
> I agree that it's not a critical bug. But on all JEMMEX, Ms HIMEM.SYS and
> XMGR : MEM reports correct values. So it's a HimemX minor bug i guess.
I just noticed that in the tests with XMSSTAT you tested the 2GB machine only but not the 1GB desktop machine which is the interesting one. Why?
---
MS-DOS forever!
Complete thread:
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 17.12.2008, 16:25
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 17.12.2008, 16:38
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 17.12.2008, 19:44
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 17.12.2008, 22:22
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 18.12.2008, 01:56
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 18.12.2008, 21:16
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 19.12.2008, 10:44
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 19.12.2008, 13:16
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 23.12.2008, 21:23
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 19.12.2008, 13:16
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 19.12.2008, 10:44
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 18.12.2008, 21:16
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 18.12.2008, 01:56
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 17.12.2008, 22:22
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - FFK, 17.12.2008, 19:44
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - DOS386, 29.12.2008, 01:59
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - Rugxulo, 29.12.2008, 23:01
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - DOS386, 30.12.2008, 22:53
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - FFK, 08.01.2009, 15:50
- D3X extender + SSE - Rugxulo, 09.01.2009, 00:48
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - FFK, 08.01.2009, 15:50
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - FFK, 31.12.2008, 09:34
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - Rugxulo, 02.01.2009, 05:01
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - FFK, 08.01.2009, 15:49
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - Rugxulo, 02.01.2009, 05:01
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - DOS386, 30.12.2008, 22:53
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? DUGL - Rugxulo, 29.12.2008, 23:01
- HimemX v3.32 bug ? - Japheth, 17.12.2008, 16:38