DOS ain't dead

hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll (DOSX)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 02.01.2010, 23:23

> > I'm not entirely sure, but it might be that FPC 2.4.0 uses some -W bits
> > here and there, and afaik now requires MSLU.
>
> First of all, I tried to play with fpc -W switches, but got no result.
>
> Putting MSLU files (unicows.dll and unicows.pdb) into testing folder
> didn't help as well.
>
> What should I do?

Dunno, but here's a informative link (esp. about the partial Mozilla reimplementation):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Layer_for_Unicode

Complete thread:

• hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 13:29
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - marcov, 02.01.2010, 21:21
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 22:11
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 02.01.2010, 23:23
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 11:33
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 15:12
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 22:46
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 10:02
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 12:01
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 13:51
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 13:55
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 14:25
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 14:31
              • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 14:42
                • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 15:52
                  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 06.01.2010, 18:42