DOS ain't dead

hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll (DOSX)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 03.01.2010, 15:12

> > Dunno, but here's a informative link (esp. about the partial Mozilla
> > reimplementation):
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Layer_for_Unicode
>
> I have no idea how to apply this to fixing the issue :(.

Sorry, not sure it will. But can you at least try OpenCow? Or try WDOSX, there is some minimal support for that in FPC too (or at least used to be).

Complete thread:

• hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 13:29
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - marcov, 02.01.2010, 21:21
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 02.01.2010, 22:11
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 02.01.2010, 23:23
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 11:33
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 15:12
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 03.01.2010, 22:46
  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 10:02
    • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 12:01
      • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 13:51
        • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 13:55
          • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Khusraw, 04.01.2010, 14:25
            • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 14:31
              • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Japheth, 04.01.2010, 14:42
                • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - post-factum, 04.01.2010, 15:52
                  • hx+win32+fpc 2.4.0 vs loadlibrary+dll - Rugxulo, 06.01.2010, 18:42