Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Search:  
Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

Mplayer HX vs DGJPP | MPXPLAY | C99 | WATCOM vs DGJPP | sou (DOSX)

posted by DOS386, 24.02.2011, 08:06

> the Khusraw release is very good, and maybe faster than Sherpya's one.
I could not reproduce any performance diff in decoding.

Mpxplay wrote:

> > > hand ffmpeg, which was already a mess, became an even greater mess
> > Any more exact observations about what's evil ?
> Most of the code is simply over-complicated.
Hmm....

> maybe other people say the same thing about my source too
Every source I have found so far was messy ... except trivial examples ("Hello World Plus") and FASM source. But latter has no comments so it is not understandable either :-(

Mpxplay wrote (other threads):

> btw. my primary problem is rather that, the Watcom
> compiler cannot compile C99 code
http://openwatcom.org/index.php/C99_Compliance :-\

> Because later (this means years) I would like to use an
> other compiler (probably GCC) for Mpxplay
Or push WATCOM devels :-\

> runtime CPU detection dependent code was broken, and I read on their board
> that they had no intention to fix this (i.e. defining HAVE_MMX implied that it
> necessarily used MMX code).
See also other thread, MMX code polluted by CMOVNTQ: msg=9466

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Post reply
 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 85 users online (0 registered, 85 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum