Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

allocation no higher than the PSP (Developers)

posted by ecm Homepage E-mail, Düsseldorf, Germany, 01.06.2011, 19:10

> If I replace the int 21 function 48h by mine

I assumed you didn't want to do that.

> Seriously I'd like to hear of others' opinion on the polite controversy

I see no controversy. I too would welcome any input on TSR development though.

> I've been stunned by CM's assumptions of TSR's allowed to basically
> mess with DOS in whatever way they fancied.

Nah, as I mentioned my assumption was wrong. While in DOS (potentially in code messing with MCBs itself: 21.48 or 21.4A or 21.5803 or 21.4B or 21.67) TSRs must not alter MCBs. Exceptions to this might exist, for example, I think a TSR can probably free its own MCBs at any time without risk.

> All this is entertaining, how much I regret I can't get a little more time
> to try and finalise all the interesting ideas...

Don't we all?

---
l

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22049 Postings in 2034 Threads, 396 registered users, 200 users online (0 registered, 200 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum