LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? (Developers)
> Did the 5V Pentium 60/90 have those? IIRC they were a bit funky too. I
> still have one of those. (admitted, as key-ring hanger though, it is not
> "operational" anymore 
I also have this CPU (60MHz) but I don't have working mobo for it. It have different socket than newer pentiums. But it's a nice piece of silicon (and gold :)
> PPro's were cool. Much faster, gigantic full speed cache (P-II was only
> half speed, but in the beginning when they competed against P-I and the
> difference was much bigger), and most importantly, the first true
> multiprocessor.
also have one machine with Asus mobo and 440FX chipset. Yes PPro has fullspeed cache but maybe there was some wait-state. There was models with 256k, 512k and 1MB (tripple chip) version. PII seems like a step-back in evolution. They created slot1 because they was not able to place all silicon to one chip but the housing was expansive so they quickly moved to S370. BTW intel is anoying with his socket update policy, there was many cases when they changed few pins and forced milions users to trash their relative new mobos. Last case was LGA1155 (sandybridge) vs LGA1156. AMD made much less socket and support them much longer. It bothering me because new mobos lacks some esential peripherals for me like PCI, COM, LPT, IDE...
---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.
Complete thread:
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 08.09.2011, 22:41 (Developers)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 08.09.2011, 23:01
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:29
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:34
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 09.09.2011, 05:44
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 09.09.2011, 19:07
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 19:44
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 10.09.2011, 23:34
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 11.09.2011, 02:33
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:46
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 13.09.2011, 01:53
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:30
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 13.09.2011, 02:00
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 14.09.2011, 01:25
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 13.09.2011, 02:00
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 11.09.2011, 02:33
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - marcov, 09.09.2011, 19:07
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 09.09.2011, 05:44
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:34
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 01:29
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 09.09.2011, 18:41
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 19:38
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 11.09.2011, 08:13
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:16
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 13.09.2011, 07:34
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 13.09.2011, 19:50
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 14.09.2011, 10:36
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 13.09.2011, 19:50
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 13.09.2011, 07:34
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 12.09.2011, 13:16
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - DOS386, 11.09.2011, 08:13
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? | DEATH of GCC - RayeR, 09.09.2011, 19:38
- LLVM for DOS/DJGPP? - Rugxulo, 08.09.2011, 23:01
Mix view