DOS ain't dead

NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor (Announce)

posted by RayeR , CZ, 02.05.2012, 22:06

> Good to hear, I suppose. The revised preprocessor (introduced in 2.10rc3 or
> so) broke basically all my sources at first, and primarily due to bugs (not
> incompatible new features). Prepared some patches way back (early 2011?),
> and while I got it to work well I never got around to suggest them to the
> NASM team. Alas, their work on the revised preprocessor in later RCs did
> address some or all of the problems as far as I remember.

Hm I was noticed by some chinese student that my ROMOS sources compiled in old NASM doesn't longer works with new NASM 2.10. I checked the compilation process and no errors/warnings was displayed but the code is different. I'm going to analyze whats messed up. But this doesn't make me very happy I think that established standard should be kept...

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

Complete thread:

• NASM 2.10 - Rugxulo, 27.03.2012, 00:39 (Announce)
  • NASM 2.10 - Rugxulo, 27.03.2012, 00:42
    • NASM 2.10 - marcov, 27.03.2012, 13:07
    • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - ecm, 20.04.2012, 04:26
      • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - RayeR, 02.05.2012, 22:06
        • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - ecm, 02.05.2012, 22:16
          • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - RayeR, 02.05.2012, 22:43
            • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - ecm, 02.05.2012, 22:48
              • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - RayeR, 03.05.2012, 00:04
                • NASM 2.10 uses "- Ox" by default - Rugxulo, 03.05.2012, 02:25
                  • NASM 2.10 uses "-Ox" by default - ecm, 03.05.2012, 02:37
                    • NASM 2.10 uses "-Ox" by default - Rugxulo, 03.05.2012, 08:18
                      • NASM 2.10 uses "-Ox" by default - ecm, 03.05.2012, 23:00
                        • NASM 2.10.01 - Rugxulo, 16.06.2012, 00:24
                • NASM 2.10 - revised preprocessor - ecm, 03.05.2012, 02:26