Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') (Miscellaneous)
> btw, the result isn't convincing, because the encode/decode process has
> added a lot of CRs.
That sounds strange. Doing b64 -e b64.exe b64.b64
+ b64 -d b64.b64 b64.ex2
should produce an identical copy of b64.exe in b64.ex2.
---
Forum admin
Complete thread:
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 12.08.2012, 23:02 (Miscellaneous)
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 13.08.2012, 08:36
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 13.08.2012, 20:05
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 00:31
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 14.08.2012, 22:33
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 23:32
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 23:53
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - RayeR, 16.08.2012, 00:13
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 16.08.2012, 16:47
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - RayeR, 16.08.2012, 00:13
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 23:53
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 23:32
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 19.08.2012, 03:25
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 14.08.2012, 22:33
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 14.08.2012, 00:31
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 13.08.2012, 20:05
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Japheth, 13.08.2012, 12:31
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 13.08.2012, 19:05
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Japheth, 13.08.2012, 20:56
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 13.08.2012, 19:05
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Khusraw, 13.08.2012, 15:17
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Doug, 13.08.2012, 21:53
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 13.08.2012, 22:41
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - glennmcc, 14.08.2012, 02:05
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - rr, 21.08.2012, 11:46
- Testers needed (benchmarking 'b64') - Rugxulo, 13.08.2012, 08:36