GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support (Announce)
> > I wonder if and what influence would this have on DJGPP. 
> 
> 
> How active is DJGPP still? To have influence you must first be active, no?
> 
> 
> If I go to their site, and click release, all I see are archives from the
> early 2000s.
They are still alive. Andros, for example, provides Fedora crosscompiler regulary. He also has GCC 4.7.2 available. Native (DJGPP) versions are usually also available on DJGPP ftp mirrors too. 
While I haven't (yet) had luck in getting it to work on the distribution I am using, I follow it from time to time. But, I'm close. The biggest problem is that the patches are scattered all around. I have to decipher Red Hat spec file to turn it into something I can use. And, I also don't have much experience with crosscompilers ATM. That's a bit of problem too. :)
LibC is unfortunatelly only somewhat active in CVS. But Rugxulo is following that much more closely than I am and he might know more. 
Complete thread:
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - bocke, 12.01.2013, 20:27 (Announce) 
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - RayeR, 12.01.2013, 21:39
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - Rugxulo, 13.01.2013, 21:07
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - bocke, 14.01.2013, 23:05
 
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - bocke, 14.01.2013, 22:30
 
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - Rugxulo, 13.01.2013, 21:07
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - marcov, 16.01.2013, 15:12
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - RayeR, 16.01.2013, 17:42
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - bocke, 18.01.2013, 16:22
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - Rugxulo, 18.01.2013, 17:43
- GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - bocke, 19.01.2013, 10:02
 
 
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - Rugxulo, 18.01.2013, 17:43
 
 
 - GNU Automake to drop DJGPP support - RayeR, 12.01.2013, 21:39
 
Mix view