DOS ain't dead

Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. (Developers)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 26.06.2013, 19:26

> The problem is: I cannot test because I have no hardware with multiple
> blocks.

Even Rod P. can't test such a machine until maybe later this fall. And I certainly have no clue whether my machines would support it or not. (I'm not a systems programmer, as you well know.)

BTW, I noticed that this is dual GPL / Artistic. Who even owns the copyright, Tom? (He still reads here sometimes, right?) Man, I hate licensing, but just FYI, apparently the "original" 1.0 version is considered "non-free" by the FSF. I know it's pointless, but I would recommend explicitly updating to newer version (Clarified? 2.0?).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License
http://opensource.org/licenses/Artistic-1.0

Complete thread:

• Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Rugxulo, 25.06.2013, 18:13 (Developers)
  • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Japheth, 26.06.2013, 09:45
    • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Rugxulo, 26.06.2013, 19:26
      • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - tom, 27.06.2013, 16:25
        • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Rugxulo, 27.06.2013, 18:39
          • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Rugxulo, 27.06.2013, 19:09
            • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Japheth, 27.06.2013, 20:43
  • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Rugxulo, 03.07.2013, 17:19
    • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - RayeR, 04.07.2013, 02:28
    • Himemx patch for proper E820h 001 memory block support. - Japheth, 04.07.2013, 08:41
      • Rod's Himemx ( and Jack's Xmgr ) work with multiple blocks - Japheth, 04.07.2013, 20:15