DOS ain't dead

EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) (Users)

posted by Rugxulo , Usono, 08.09.2013, 17:53

> > Nothing - King Udo is dead
> I am quite frozen now. Was not aware on that. I am so sorry for his loss
>

Uh, I haven't heard anything from Udo recently (not that I was supposed to), but I seriously doubt this was meant literally. He's most likely not physically dead, it's just DOS386's weird way of talking about the project's lack of activity.

In particular, once before some misinformed people on DR-DOS Forum proclaimed Jack Ellis dead, and that wasn't true at all! I don't know where such rumors start, but here it's almost definitely not intentional on DOS386's part.

Complete thread:

• Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 08.07.2013, 11:56 (Users)
  • Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - glennmcc, 09.07.2013, 00:24
    • Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 08:51
      • Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 09.07.2013, 20:12
        • Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - RayeR, 10.07.2013, 02:06
          • Enhanced DR-DOS FAT32 corruption - Guti, 10.07.2013, 19:42
            • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 09.08.2013, 10:53
              • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 08.09.2013, 08:52
                • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Rugxulo, 08.09.2013, 17:53
                  • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 09.09.2013, 08:18
                    • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - DOS386, 11.09.2013, 04:41
                      • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - glennmcc, 11.09.2013, 17:07
                      • EDR-DOS FAT28 corruption (most likely NOT due to EDR-DOS) - Guti, 27.09.2013, 13:10