Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

non-DOS (yet): an interesting project for x86-64 (Miscellaneous)

posted by rr Homepage E-mail, Berlin, Germany, 25.01.2021, 13:05

> _I_ never said ANYTHING about MS.

See below.

> What _I_ asked and have continued to discuss is.. a 64bit DOS
>
> I also have never suggested that a 64bit DOS should be able to run existing
> 16bit or 32bit programs.

Okay. Then take an x64 Linux distro or Windows x64 and be happy. Both work on/with disks, so these qualifies as "DOS".

> Again, all I asked was....
>
> Q: Has anyone ever even attempted to create an actual 64bit DOS kernel ?
>
> Why did your brain automatically convert "DOS" into "MS-DOS" ???
>
> Why not "DOS" into "DR-DOS" ?
>
> Why not "DOS into "FreeDOS" ?

In general, FreeDOS, DR-DOS, PTS-DOS, ..., were modelled after MS-DOS. Not talking about MS-DOS in this case, would be not talking about DOS anymore as we understand it in this forum.

Do you want to talk about putting an ARM64 CPU to a C64 and creating a 64-bit Commodore DOS now?

> I my case... when I speak of booting my computers to DOS,
> the DOS I am booting to since 1997 is OpenDOS v7.01
>
> Before that it was DR-DOS v6.0 and before that DR-DOS v5.0
>
> Every machine I have ever owned which came with MS-DOS already on it,
> had it removed to be replaced by one of the above within just a few
> minutes of being in my possession.

Nice. But as you see, your case is not everybody else' case.

> Had I known that asking one simple question could cause this much
> controversy... I would not have asked it. ;-)

Not the first time in human history, that "simple" questions are not so simple to answer.

---
Forum admin

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22208 Postings in 2050 Threads, 396 registered users, 173 users online (0 registered, 173 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum