DOS ain't dead

XDMA32? (Miscellaneous)

posted by RayeR , CZ, 19.11.2007, 10:45

> Well, why not but isn't it useless?
> I mean - UIDE is mature product which is efficient, stable and very tiny.
> It occupies in memory around 1KB - your XDMA would occupy 0KB but who
> cares? Benefit would be questionable and it is a lot of work.
> There are better candidates for it - ANSI.SYS, USB support, mouse support,
> NTFS...

I'd be rather if will exist more complex version but handling more classes of IDE/SATA controllers.

---
DOS gives me freedom to unlimited HW access.

Complete thread:

• New version? - Laaca, 17.11.2007, 23:32 (Miscellaneous)
  • XDMA32? - Japheth, 18.11.2007, 01:01
    • XDMA32? - Rugxulo, 18.11.2007, 03:18
      • XDMA32? - avoskov, 18.11.2007, 10:23
        • JCLOCK2 + further JLM ideas - Rugxulo, 26.11.2007, 19:24
    • XDMA32? - Laaca, 18.11.2007, 17:22
      • XDMA32? - Japheth, 18.11.2007, 19:00
      • XDMA32? - avoskov, 18.11.2007, 22:55
      • XDMA32? - RayeR, 19.11.2007, 10:45
      • XDMA32 vs USB vs NTFS vs whatever ... - Rugxulo, 21.11.2007, 10:16
    • XDMA32? - flox, 21.11.2007, 17:30
      • XDMA32? - Japheth, 21.11.2007, 18:02
        • XDMA32? - rr, 22.11.2007, 12:11
          • UIDE32! - Japheth, 22.11.2007, 14:12
  • HX future / issues - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 07:58