To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) (DOSX)
Japheth wrote ( http://japheth.de/HX.html ) :
> The MZ format compared to the PE format has some limitations, though.
> - applications cannot run in a true flat (=zero-based) memory model
Recently, something very BAD happened:
I hacked on the USEDPMI.ASM example (generously discussed in other forum ) - and got a true flat ZERO-based memory model !!! With very marginal adjustments only What's wrong ? Is the statement correct ? Did I miss something ? Where is the limitation supposed to come from ?
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - DOS386, 05.08.2007, 08:33 (DOSX)
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - Japheth, 05.08.2007, 09:22
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - DOS386, 05.08.2007, 14:45
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - Japheth, 06.08.2007, 07:52
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) vs C - DOS386, 09.08.2007, 19:12
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) vs C - Japheth, 10.08.2007, 07:18
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) vs C - DOS386, 09.08.2007, 19:12
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - Japheth, 06.08.2007, 07:52
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - DOS386, 05.08.2007, 14:45
- To ZERO or NOT to ZERO (memory / segment basing) - Japheth, 05.08.2007, 09:22