Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

nuclear war (Miscellaneous)

posted by kerravon E-mail, Sydney, Free World South, 12.11.2022, 10:29

> Hello kerravon,
>
> > > Well, OK: this "victory" of "ours" in the "Cold War" is all sunshine
> and
> > > roses, we just need to furiously turn a blind eye to all those parts
> > that
> > > are not sunshine and roses. Truly a glorious victory.
> > We're not turning a blind eye. We're doing our
> > best to free the rest of the world too.
>
> Sorry, you just do not get it.

No, you don't get the difficulty in bringing
freedom to humanity.

> > You are the one making the claim that no-one else
> > in the entire world now or in the future will ever
> > have a use for a standardized API for small
> > computer systems. So the burden of proof is on you.
>
> Maybe the world will need a standard, but I am pretty sure that we
> do not need your proposed standard,

My proposal was just an example. I have no
particular desire to have that exact
standard adopted. I do have a particular
desire to make sure it isn't Posix unless
they remove fork() from it, just for starters.

> since it does not do anything
> that is not already covered by other more established standards and
> practices.
>
> Hope that clears things up.

Can you be specific please? What is the
existing standard/practice that you see
for small computer systems, and would you
have recommended that standard/practice
be used on the Amiga so that Commodore
didn't go bankrupt?

Commodore instead created another API.

BFN. Paul.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22141 Postings in 2045 Threads, 396 registered users, 17 users online (0 registered, 17 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum