Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

nuclear war (Miscellaneous)

posted by kerravon E-mail, Sydney, Free World South, 16.11.2022, 03:19

> > Wrong. I'm not claiming that a standard is or
> > isn't useful to anyone besides me. I have no
> > idea. I just know that at a minimum one person
> > wants it. Absolute bare minimum.
>
> That's not a standard. That is an implementation.

Individual companies normally have coding standards.
They may not be "internationally recognized" (whoever
that is), but they're still standards.

If I write all my code to a particular standard, even
as far as the number of spaces for indentation, that's
still a standard, even if I'm the only user of that
standard.

Regardless, if you want to call it an implementation,
I don't wish to engage in a semantic debate.

What "implementation" do you suggest for small
computers to follow, to allow portability at the
C90 source code level, above and beyond what C90
itself supports? POSIX doesn't cut it. It relies
on the existence of virtual memory.

Thanks. Paul.

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22141 Postings in 2045 Threads, 396 registered users, 15 users online (1 registered, 14 guests)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum