zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 (Users)
> I tried it recompile too and I have to note some obstacles I needed to
> overcome...
> * The make file was not compatible with borland make, I have to find and DL
> NDMAKE
> * makefile needed some abs.path editing
> * link was not found, not sure what they used but I decided to use borland
> tlink
> * linking faile because of too long command line (many obj files). I had to
> create response file and call tlink with it.
> Then it finally rebuilt and it works on my 2GB FAT16 partitions. I used BC
> 4.52.
File zoo.1
reads:
The executable version 2.0 for MS-DOS is currently compiled with Borland's Turbo C++ 1.0.
But wcomp -3 -v
says:
ZOO.EXE Microsoft C 6.0 [Overlays] [OS/2]
[ Author : Rahul Dhesi -- ]
[Stack overflow checked]
---
Forum admin
Complete thread:
- zoo files extraction - fritz.mueller, 26.01.2024, 17:17 (Users)
- zoo files extraction - RayeR, 26.01.2024, 17:21
- zoo files extraction - Ringding, 26.01.2024, 17:38
- zoo files extraction - mceric, 26.01.2024, 21:19
- zoo files extraction - Ringding, 26.01.2024, 17:38
- zoo files extraction - jadoxa, 27.01.2024, 03:55
- zoo files extraction - mceric, 27.01.2024, 12:01
- zoo files extraction - fritz.mueller, 27.01.2024, 19:10
- zoo files extraction - Rugxulo, 27.01.2024, 21:42
- zoo files extraction - Rugxulo, 28.01.2024, 15:34
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - mceric, 27.01.2024, 21:48
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - Ringding, 28.01.2024, 20:13
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - Rugxulo, 28.01.2024, 22:53
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - RayeR, 29.01.2024, 06:29
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - rr, 29.01.2024, 08:45
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - Ringding, 29.01.2024, 09:03
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - RayeR, 29.01.2024, 13:45
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - fritz.mueller, 29.01.2024, 18:52
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - Rugxulo, 29.01.2024, 21:02
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - RayeR, 29.01.2024, 13:45
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - rr, 29.01.2024, 08:55
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - roytam, 29.01.2024, 10:06
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - rr, 29.01.2024, 19:07
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - roytam, 29.01.2024, 10:06
- zoo cluster size overflow vs chkdsk or scandisk for fat32 - Ringding, 28.01.2024, 20:13
- zoo files extraction - Rugxulo, 27.01.2024, 21:42
- zoo files extraction - RayeR, 28.01.2024, 15:05
- zoo files extraction - Ringding, 28.01.2024, 20:22
- zoo files extraction - fritz.mueller, 28.01.2024, 22:21
- zoo files extraction - Ringding, 28.01.2024, 20:22
- zoo files extraction - fritz.mueller, 27.01.2024, 19:10
- zoo files extraction - mceric, 27.01.2024, 12:01
- zoo files extraction - RayeR, 26.01.2024, 17:21