MSDOS 4.0 (Announce)
> > if you can overcome the fact that the source files are all LF only,
> while
> > the good old MS-DOS tools from the 80ties stubbornly persist on CR/LF
> line
> > endings.
>
> Maybe it happened due to some github online conversion? Versioning SW
> sometimes do this fun stuff, depend how configured. But no problem to
> batch-convert back to CR+LF...
There were more problems than just that, but I have
overcome them (a lot of effort after I sent that
previous post - and I was unexpectedly out of
internet coverage) with my Windows 2000 system
and you can find:
http://pdos.org/dos4.zip
See \devel\dos4mods\readme.txt
There are still more issues found when I attempted to
redo the build on DOS 4.0 itself instead of Windows 2000.
The CRLF hit harder for some reason, so the files like
chdir.asm will choke with either a hang or spurious errors.
You need to add FILES= whatever to config.sys
Can't remember if I added the SHELL= - need to increase
the environment space.
I will fix those errors in due course and upload a new
version, but that's what I have at the moment.
I am at a bit of a quandry here.
I had to use edlin to make any changes. I finally got
"e" to exit with save as opposed to "q" to quit.
Using just this disk - ie just the raw DOS 4.0 files -
I could theoretically write a program to convert
LF to CRLF etc rather than just copying an unzip
program across. I already have a crlffix - I could
copy that across instead and likely compile it.
Not sure what a sensible goal here would be.
I am actually interested in having MSDOS 4.0 (modified)
competing against Freedos. MSDOS 4.0 has the more
liberal license. Basically no conditions (MIT).
BFN. Paul.
Complete thread:
- MSDOS 4.0 - kerravon, 26.04.2024, 04:43 (Announce)
- MSDOS 4.0 - Guti, 26.04.2024, 14:06
- MSDOS 4.0 - Oso2k, 26.04.2024, 15:38
- MSDOS 4.0 - roytam, 26.04.2024, 17:05
- MSDOS 4.0 - rr, 26.04.2024, 22:00
- MSDOS 4.0 - usotsuki, 30.04.2024, 17:41
- MSDOS 4.0 - boeckmann, 30.04.2024, 21:03