BatteryMax (Developers)
> FDAPM should perform better in terms of energy saving, but worse in terms
> of performance. Advantage of this is that takes advantage of IDLE$ already
> built on DRDOS kernel.
"Should" based on which assumptions? Have you compared the drivers in practice, also comparing different settings for FDAPM? See the documentation, the FDAPM APMDOS default is a bit heavy on energy saving, but you can select more moderate ADV:... strategies to reduce impact on performance.
As you mention IDLE$ in the DRDOS kernel, you could also include IDLEHALT in the FreeDOS kernel in your comparisons
---
FreeDOS / DOSEMU2 / ...
Complete thread:
- BatteryMax - Guti, 07.07.2013, 17:02 (Developers)
- BatteryMax - Rugxulo, 07.07.2013, 18:17
- BatteryMax - Guti, 07.07.2013, 20:55
- BatteryMax - Guti, 03.05.2025, 11:07
- BatteryMax - mceric, 03.05.2025, 14:26
- BatteryMax - Guti, 03.05.2025, 21:36
- BatteryMax - mceric, 04.05.2025, 00:50
- BatteryMax - Guti, 04.05.2025, 08:41
- BatteryMax - mceric, 04.05.2025, 00:50
- BatteryMax - rr, 04.05.2025, 11:17
- BatteryMax - Guti, 03.05.2025, 21:36
- BatteryMax - mceric, 03.05.2025, 14:26
- BatteryMax - Rugxulo, 07.07.2013, 18:17