DOS ain't dead - Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<<

Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< (Miscellaneous)

posted by rr , Berlin, Germany, 20.12.2007, 17:31

> Why not just "DOS Forum" or "The DOS Forum"?

Lack of creativity? ;-)

---
Forum admin

Post reply

Complete thread:

Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 10.12.2007, 12:34 (Miscellaneous)
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - iw2evk, 10.12.2007, 13:22
  - Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 10.12.2007, 16:32
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - Steve, 10.12.2007, 13:39
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 10.12.2007, 23:52
  - Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 10:25
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - Japheth, 11.12.2007, 11:34
  - Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 11:47
    - Important! Call for better name for this forum - Japheth, 11.12.2007, 12:14
      - Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 13:17
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 11.12.2007, 12:16
  - Important! Call for better name for this forum - rr, 11.12.2007, 13:19
    - Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 11.12.2007, 13:41
      - Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 11.12.2007, 18:23
        Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 11.12.2007, 18:48
      - Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 08:43
        Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 14.12.2007, 13:10
        Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 14.12.2007, 19:12
        Important! Call for better name for this forum - jaybur, 14.12.2007, 22:25
        Important! Call for better name for this forum - DOS386, 15.12.2007, 18:08
- Important! Call for better name for this forum - DOS386, 12.12.2007, 01:20
  - Important! Call for better name for this forum - Rugxulo, 12.12.2007, 18:14
    - Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - DOS386, 14.12.2007, 05:49
      - Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - rr, 17.12.2007, 13:32
        Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - flox, 17.12.2007, 16:10
        Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - Japheth, 19.12.2007, 02:58
        Got it: >>> DOS For(ever)um <<< - rr, 20.12.2007, 17:31