EDR-DOS (Users)
> > > The public availability of a
> source
> code means that it's open, doesn't it?
> >
> > No.
>
> So I don't know English at all.
It's just a little bit difficult. There's the term "open source" as defined in Open Source Definition (OSD) by the Open Source Initiative. And there are just the words "open" and "source" concatenated. So yes, it's open source (because you're allowed to look at it), but not in the meaning of the OSD.
---
Forum admin
Thread locked
Complete thread:
- Do you know MultiDOS? - mr, 16.05.2008, 15:10 (Users)
- Do you know MultiDOS? - Steve, 18.05.2008, 09:17
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 08:45
- EDR-DOS - rr, 19.05.2008, 09:45
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 19.05.2008, 15:07
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 17:36
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 19.05.2008, 18:14
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 18:45
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 19.05.2008, 21:06
- EDR-DOS - Rugxulo, 19.05.2008, 23:15
- DR-DOS - lucho, 20.05.2008, 13:11
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 20.05.2008, 17:30
- DR-DOS 8 - lucho, 20.05.2008, 17:54
- EDR-DOS - Rugxulo, 20.05.2008, 21:49
- DR-DOS vs. MS-DOS source code - lucho, 21.05.2008, 20:18
- DR-DOS vs. MS-DOS source code - rr, 21.05.2008, 22:10
- Micro$0ft - lucho, 22.05.2008, 15:40
- DR-DOS vs. MS-DOS source code - rr, 21.05.2008, 22:10
- DR-DOS vs. MS-DOS source code - lucho, 21.05.2008, 20:18
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 20.05.2008, 08:24
- Open source vs. free software - lucho, 22.05.2008, 16:03
- EDR-DOS - Rugxulo, 19.05.2008, 23:15
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 19.05.2008, 21:06
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 18:45
- EDR-DOS - Steve, 19.05.2008, 18:14
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 17:36
- Do you know MultiDOS? - Japheth, 19.05.2008, 10:00
- OpenDOS licence - lucho, 19.05.2008, 10:38
- OpenDOS licence - rr, 19.05.2008, 11:27
- OpenDOS licence - lucho, 19.05.2008, 14:53
- OpenDOS licence - rr, 19.05.2008, 15:25
- OpenDOS licence - lucho, 19.05.2008, 14:53
- OpenDOS licence - rr, 19.05.2008, 11:27
- OpenDOS licence - lucho, 19.05.2008, 10:38
- EDR-DOS - lucho, 19.05.2008, 08:45
- Do you know MultiDOS? - Steve, 18.05.2008, 09:17