DOS ain't dead

BUG? What BUG? (DOSX)

posted by Japheth , Germany (South), 14.06.2008, 15:57

> Thanks for the hint ... trivial as hell (since I already know what the
> reason of the deadlock is, 3 days ago I didn't ) ... but this won't
> damage the fact that DPMILD32 has a bug

dpmild32 doesn't care about the PE "readable" bit (IMAGE_SCN_MEM_READ) at all. And I'm not in the mood to analyze how Fasm converts its segment attributes to COFF section attributes. Since it occurs with Fasm "hand-made" PEs only, it can be ignored IMO.

> I wonder how the answer might have differed if I just pointed about
> Tomasz's DLL example not working with HX, without investigating /
> revealing why

I doubt that this would have made any difference. It's still much work for almost nothing.

---
MS-DOS forever!

Complete thread:

• [BUG] unreadable reloXection deadlocks DPMILD32 - DOS386, 12.06.2008, 23:58 (DOSX)
  • BUG? What BUG? - Japheth, 13.06.2008, 08:40
    • BUG? What BUG? - DOS386, 14.06.2008, 15:02
      • BUG? What BUG? - Japheth, 14.06.2008, 15:57
        • 1. Closed: NOT a BUG | 2. Closed: NOT a BUG | 3. Closed: NB - DOS386, 19.06.2008, 09:04
          • 1. Closed: NOT a BUG | 2. Closed: NOT a BUG | 3. Closed: NB - DOS386, 19.06.2008, 09:06
          • 1. Closed: NOT a BUG | 2. Closed: NOT a BUG | 3. Closed: NB - Japheth, 19.06.2008, 10:29
            • 1. Closed: NOT a BUG | 2. Closed: NOT a BUG | 3. Closed: NB - DOS386, 20.06.2008, 09:51
            • Discovered a NEW BUG in DPMILD32 - DOS386, 18.12.2009, 03:21
              • Discovered a NEW BUG in DPMILD32 - Japheth, 19.12.2009, 07:44
                • Discovered a NEW BUG in DPMILD32 - DOS386, 19.12.2009, 14:04