DOS ain't dead

IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 (Users)

posted by rr  , Berlin, Germany, 10.09.2008, 11:57

> - XDMA32 works also (but "expensive").

"expensive" means what here?

> Why does it offer modes 0 to 5 and pick only 2 then ? "supported" modes >2
> are VERY slow (see above) ... but the antique HD indeed might
> support UDMA 2 at best ...

What HDD and mainboard chipset did you use?

---
Forum admin

Complete thread:

• IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 10.09.2008, 02:41 (Users)
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Japheth, 10.09.2008, 07:50
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 23.09.2008, 15:58
      • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - DOS386, 25.09.2008, 16:00
        • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 04.10.2008, 04:57
          • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - Japheth, 04.10.2008, 09:01
            • IDE performance | new bugs discovered in IDECHECK - DOS386, 05.10.2008, 13:58
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - rr, 10.09.2008, 11:57
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - RayeR, 10.09.2008, 15:34
    • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Rugxulo, 10.09.2008, 16:03
  • IDE performance | bugs in IDECHECK, UIDE, XDMA, XDMA32 - Khusraw, 10.09.2008, 16:12