Question about some x86 opcodes (Developers)
> Even if DOS world, many software writers do not care about anything below
> 386 nowadays. But I like to maintain compatibility whenever possible. And,
> last but not least, the ability to save one byte of code is sometimes
> critical 
>
> Can anyone help?
There is an option in Masm:
OPTION NOSIGNEXTEND
and the documentation says:
NOSIGNEXTEND Overrides the default sign-extended opcodes for the AND, OR, and XOR instructions and generates the larger non-sign-extended forms of these instructions. Provided for compatibility with NEC V25 and NEC V35 controllers.
---
MS-DOS forever!
Complete thread:
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 02.11.2008, 14:02 (Developers)
![Open in board view [Board]](img/board_d.gif)
![Open in mix view [Mix]](img/mix_d.gif)
- Question about some x86 opcodes - Japheth, 02.11.2008, 17:51
- Question about some x86 opcodes - DOS386, 03.11.2008, 10:04
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 05.11.2008, 19:54
- Question about some x86 opcodes - Rugxulo, 06.11.2008, 21:06
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 08.11.2008, 08:46
- Question about some x86 opcodes - Rugxulo, 12.11.2008, 00:43
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 12.11.2008, 16:54
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 22.11.2008, 13:59
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 12.11.2008, 16:54
- Question about some x86 opcodes - Rugxulo, 12.11.2008, 00:43
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 08.11.2008, 08:46
- Question about some x86 opcodes - Rugxulo, 06.11.2008, 21:06
- Question about some x86 opcodes - mht, 05.11.2008, 19:54
Mix view