DOS ain't dead

This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS (Announce)

posted by DOS386, 07.04.2009, 05:05

> Of what? Is Int21.25 crashing your system?

NO:

1. reentrancy problems
2. implementation bugs
3. deliberately bad implementations

> new memory block then hack its MCB so that it points at the memory block
> itself (instead of to your PSP) it won't be freed by the program termination.

OK.

> I don't know what "UTFG UTFI" is

Clicking the 2 links would have revealed the truth.

> but just read the AMIS description at Int2D in RBIL 61.

OK.

> It also presents how the IBM Interrupt Sharing Protocol

that IBM is not aware of

> entry looks and sometimes uses the abbreviated form ISP, which I don't
> want to use to avoid confusion with the term "Internet Service Provider".

again, try the 2 links

> And it doesn't have much "bloat" on Int21, or what?

It does ... at least some of the subfunctions are somewhat useful here

> uses such crappy fake Win32 function names as you seem to like

I care more about crappy-or-non-crappy and fake-or-non-fake implementations than crappy-or-non-crappy and fake-or-non-fake function names.

---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***

Complete thread:

• This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - DOS386, 22.03.2009, 04:56 (Announce)
  • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Laaca, 22.03.2009, 09:11
  • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 22.03.2009, 11:36
  • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 22.03.2009, 20:05
    • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 22.03.2009, 21:57
      • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 19:01
        • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 25.03.2009, 19:10
          • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - mr, 25.03.2009, 20:09
            • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - ecm, 26.03.2009, 20:43
              • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Khusraw, 27.03.2009, 08:29
                • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - RayeR, 28.03.2009, 03:17
        • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Khusraw, 25.03.2009, 22:08
  • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - rr, 22.03.2009, 21:53
  • Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - Japheth, 27.03.2009, 09:23
    • Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - ecm, 27.03.2009, 15:12
    • Impossible to beat? This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - Rugxulo, 27.03.2009, 17:12
    • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 31.03.2009, 04:03
      • Yes - Japheth, 31.03.2009, 10:53
      • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 31.03.2009, 23:10
        • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 05.04.2009, 04:21
          • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 05.04.2009, 09:27
            • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - DOS386, 07.04.2009, 05:05
              • This version needs 0/0/0/0 Bytes - but not on EDR-DOS - ecm, 07.04.2009, 13:34
  • This TSR is impossible to beat !!! 116/48/32/0 Bytes ARF pr - Arjay, 11.12.2009, 12:21