Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

stable release ready BUT... (Announce)

posted by ecm Homepage E-mail, Düsseldorf, Germany, 02.12.2009, 18:34

> Of course their source is derived from Microsoft's and partly kept in
> sync. However quickly peeking at the DOS DATA segment while I was trying
> to run my hack showed significant differences in the layout. Is PC-DOS 7
> supposed to be able to run Windows 9x anyway ? I have not researched
> whether it maintains a table of loaded TSRs nor whether the MS bug is
> present. You might be able to help in this respect.

PC-DOS doesn't support Windows 4.x (or Windows doesn't support PC-DOS?). AFAIK even the PC-DOS 6 distribution was different from MS-DOS, so maybe they didn't sync version 7 either.

> For instance I hacked MS DEBUG way back (DOS 3.21 times) to be able to
> launch it as a driver.

Is that, like, a necessity for DOS programmers? I did that (independantly!) a year after learning to program. I thought no one else would ever have such a great idea. Silly me!

---
l

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum