7-Zip 9.09 buggy (Announce)
> > Using "7za b", 9.09 seems to be 3-5% faster than 4.57 on my P166 using
> > latest stable HX (ignoring the partially buggy output)
>
> Heh ??? How buggy ???
>
> > Anyways, it doesn't matter
>
> Corrupt files don't matter ???
I meant the numbers for one of the columns listed when benchmarking (Usage %) are obviously bogus (HX regression). Everything else is fine.
Complete thread:
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - Rugxulo, 13.12.2009, 10:41 (Announce)
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - DOS386, 15.12.2009, 02:53
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - Rugxulo, 15.12.2009, 08:34
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - DOS386, 18.12.2009, 01:37
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - Rugxulo, 18.12.2009, 13:00
- 7-Zip 9.09 buggy - DOS386, 19.12.2009, 04:12
- 7-Zip 9.09 buggy - Rugxulo, 19.12.2009, 05:26
- HX is buggy - NOT 7-ZIP - DOS386, 19.12.2009, 14:11
- 7-Zip 9.09 buggy - Rugxulo, 19.12.2009, 05:26
- 7-Zip 9.09 buggy - DOS386, 19.12.2009, 04:12
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - Rugxulo, 18.12.2009, 13:00
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - DOS386, 18.12.2009, 01:37
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - Rugxulo, 15.12.2009, 08:34
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - DOS386, 25.12.2009, 15:18
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 16:17
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 21:15
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - DOS386, 29.12.2009, 09:32
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 29.12.2009, 22:19
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 31.12.2009, 06:59
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 21:15
- 7-Zip 9.10 beta - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 16:17
- 7-Zip 9.09 beta - DOS386, 15.12.2009, 02:53