> 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI (Developers)
> I'm not sure if it's necessary to post everyday builds, let us know when
> it will be stable and ready for common use :)
Well, he claims he found and fixed some massively obvious bugs in the 2003 r6, hence it hasn't been tested too well in real-world use. So he's being a bit cautious on releasing it as-is. In particular, I didn't want anybody here to test only an old version. But it does work building Stone Soup 0.5.2 with -O2 (G++ 3.4.4 or 4.2.3) in FreeDOS w/ DOSLFN w/ XMGR and/or JEMM386 MAX=400000. That alone uses > 100 MB.
Thread locked
Complete thread:
- > 3 GB of RAM (hypothetical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 19.12.2009, 03:33 (Developers)
- > 3 GB of RAM (hypothetical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 26.12.2009, 15:09
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - DOS386, 27.12.2009, 02:21
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 27.12.2009, 02:32
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Laaca, 27.12.2009, 12:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI r6 - Rugxulo, 27.12.2009, 14:25
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - DOS386, 28.12.2009, 08:14
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 16:13
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 30.12.2009, 13:48
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 31.12.2009, 06:57
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 17:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - RayeR, 05.01.2010, 21:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 06.01.2010, 18:21
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - RayeR, 05.01.2010, 21:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 03.01.2010, 17:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 31.12.2009, 06:57
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 30.12.2009, 13:48
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 28.12.2009, 16:13
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Laaca, 27.12.2009, 12:20
- > 3 GiB of RAM (physical), CWSDPMI - Rugxulo, 27.12.2009, 02:32