Back to home page

DOS ain't dead

Forum index page

Log in | Register

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view

DOS Filenames (Users)

posted by bretjohn Homepage E-mail, Rio Rancho, NM, 27.07.2010, 22:09

> And my main pet peeve is the following ...
>
> Reference ...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9660
>
> Please observe it's directory depth limitation of "8". Even on a simple
> FAT32 drive.

This is interesting, since this is even more restrictive than DOS file naming conventions. This says that file names can only have upper-case letters, numbers, and underscores. There are quite a few more "legal" characters than those that can be used in a DOS file name.

This also says that directory names must never use dots (and thus are limited to 8 characters), also more restrictive than DOS (and not simply a "preference"). I see Rugxulo's comment below about some DOS programs not working with 8.3 directory names, but those are buggy programs, not a limitation of DOS. All DOS programs are _supposed_ to be able to understand 8.3 directory names.

In addition, DOS is not limited to 8 levels of sub-directories. The limit in DOS is that the path name to a file can be no longer than 64 characters. In some cases this is less than 8 levels, and in other cases more.

So ...

Are you recommending that only ISO 9660 Level 1 compatible file names be used, or DOS 8.3 compatible file names?

 

Complete thread:

Back to the forum
Board view  Mix view
22762 Postings in 2122 Threads, 402 registered users (0 online)
DOS ain't dead | Admin contact
RSS Feed
powered by my little forum