With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example (Developers)
> > > > The only way is just to terminate the application.
> > > Correct.
> > Not that much.
> Well tell us.
NO I won't. No need to duplicate Japheth's work, see above.
> How bout you just execute your own executable?
Bad hack.
> Besides, this particular issue doesn't exist for a Windows process and
> without a problem to work around, faking a child isn't useful anyway.
Strange, how do you execute 3rd party crappy code then ? And why did Firefox ban crappy plugins (most notably Flash) into a separate process ?
> In other news: lol if u b trollin b trollin r8 dude
Is it 64-bit code ? Does it compile ???
> (2) I prefer DPMI. Although you don't have ring 0 access right away, it's
> just so much easier to set up.
Right, no pain no gain
> (BTW for ring 0 access I prefer JLMs.)
Sure, and this works without external files
---
This is a LOGITECH mouse driver, but some software expect here
the following string:*** This is Copyright 1983 Microsoft ***
Complete thread:
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Laaca, 13.08.2010, 10:36 (Developers)
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 13.08.2010, 14:30
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - DOS386, 26.08.2010, 09:18
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 26.08.2010, 14:35
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - DOS386, 27.08.2010, 03:33
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 30.08.2010, 21:51
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 06.09.2010, 20:08
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - ecm, 07.09.2010, 17:04
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 08.09.2010, 00:51
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - ecm, 08.09.2010, 20:53
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 11.09.2010, 01:02
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - ecm, 11.09.2010, 01:25
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 11.09.2010, 01:02
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - ecm, 08.09.2010, 20:53
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 08.09.2010, 00:51
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - ecm, 07.09.2010, 17:04
- With DPMI into protect mode and back | physical memory - DOS386, 06.09.2010, 20:08
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 30.08.2010, 21:51
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - DOS386, 27.08.2010, 03:33
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 26.08.2010, 14:35
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - DOS386, 26.08.2010, 09:18
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 18.08.2010, 08:04
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 18.10.2010, 11:17
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Rugxulo, 18.10.2010, 23:07
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 19.10.2010, 09:58
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Rugxulo, 19.10.2010, 10:09
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 19.10.2010, 10:20
- Possible CWSDPMI design flaw - Japheth, 19.10.2010, 17:59
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Rugxulo, 19.10.2010, 10:09
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 19.10.2010, 09:58
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Rugxulo, 18.10.2010, 23:07
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - Japheth, 18.10.2010, 11:17
- With DPMI into protect mode and back - EDIT: example - ecm, 13.08.2010, 14:30